CVE-2026-5921: Server-Side Request Forgery in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed extraction of sensitive environment variables via timing side-channel…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.42% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: GitHub Enterprise Server 3.14.26, 3.15.21, 3.16.17.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to GitHub Enterprise Server 3.14.26, 3.15.21, 3.16.17 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker to extract sensitive environment variables from the instance through a timing side-channel attack against the notebook rendering service. When private mode was disabled, the notebook viewer followed HTTP redirects without revalidating the destination host, enabling an unauthenticated SSRF to internal services. By chaining this with regex filter queries against an internal API and measuring response time differences, an attacker could infer secret values character by character. Exploitation required that private mode be disabled and that the attacker be able to chain the instance's open redirect endpoint through an external redirect to reach internal services. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.14.26, 3.15.21, 3.16.17, 3.17.14, 3.18.8, 3.19.5, and 3.20.1. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
- Published
- Apr 21, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 26, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 37th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
35
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_P
- 8.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| github | enterprise server | cpe:2.3:a:github:enterprise_server |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_P). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GitHub Enterprise Server
- 3.14.0 and later · before 3.14.26affected · semverfixed in 3.14.26
- 3.15.0 and later · before 3.15.21affected · semverfixed in 3.15.21
- 3.16.0 and later · before 3.16.17affected · semverfixed in 3.16.17
- 3.17.0 and later · before 3.17.14affected · semverfixed in 3.17.14
- 3.18.0 and later · before 3.18.8affected · semverfixed in 3.18.8
- 3.19.0 and later · before 3.19.5affected · semverfixed in 3.19.5
- 3.20.0 and later · before 3.20.1affected · semverfixed in 3.20.1
Affected versions · NVD (7)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- github enterprise serverbefore 3.14.26
- github enterprise server3.15.0 and later · before 3.15.21
- github enterprise server3.16.0 and later · before 3.16.17
- github enterprise server3.17.0 and later · before 3.17.14
- github enterprise server3.18.0 and later · before 3.18.8
- github enterprise server3.19.0 and later · before 3.19.5
- github enterprise server3.20.0
Same product
github: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-0200Unsafe Reflection in Github Enterprise Server leading to Command Injection61This week
- CVE-2024-0507Privilege Escalation by Code Injection in the Management Console in GitHub Enterprise Server55Plan
- CVE-2026-3854Remote code execution via git push option injection in GitHub Enterprise Server47Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-5512Apr 21, 2026 · Improper authorization vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed disclosure of private repository names via mobile upload policy…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-5845Apr 21, 2026 · Improper authorization fallback allows scoped user-to-server token installation escape in GitHub Enterprise Server28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-6736May 7, 2026 · Authentication bypass vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed creation of local user accounts bypassing the configured external identity provider25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.14.26 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.15.21 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.16.17 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.17.14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.18.8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.19.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.20.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- R31nfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-931235 days apartServer-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed access to internal services via path traversal in upload endpoint39Monitor
- CVE-2026-96890168 days apartServer-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed requests to attacker-controlled internal hosts34Monitor
- CVE-2026-18730133 days apartServer-side request forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server Manage API leaked a replayable gateway-agent bearer token32Monitor
- CVE-2026-76851133 days apartServer-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed remote code execution via network access from pre-receive hooks to internal…30Monitor
- CVE-2026-860635 days apartServer-Side Request Forgery in GitHub Enterprise Server via Advisory Package URL Endpoint28Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.15/admin/release-notes#3.15.21
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.16/admin/release-notes#3.16.17
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.17/admin/release-notes#3.17.14
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.18/admin/release-notes#3.18.8
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.19/admin/release-notes#3.19.5
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.20/admin/release-notes#3.20.1
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.