CVE-2026-3854: Remote code execution via git push option injection in GitHub Enterprise Server
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 47/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 41.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: GitHub Enterprise Server 3.14.25, 3.15.20, 3.16.16.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to GitHub Enterprise Server 3.14.25, 3.15.20, 3.16.16 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An improper neutralization of special elements vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker with push access to a repository to achieve remote code execution on the instance. During a git push operation, user-supplied push option values were not properly sanitized before being included in internal service headers. Because the internal header format used a delimiter character that could also appear in user input, an attacker could inject additional metadata fields through crafted push option values. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program and has been fixed in GitHub Enterprise Server versions 3.14.25, 3.15.20, 3.16.16, 3.17.13, 3.18.7 and 3.19.4.
- Published
- Mar 10, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 41.9% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-77
Report tools
Action score
47
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 13 / 30 · 41.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_P
- 8.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| github | enterprise server | cpe:2.3:a:github:enterprise_server |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- github enterprise serverbefore 3.14.24
- github enterprise server3.15.0 and later · before 3.15.19
- github enterprise server3.16.0 and later · before 3.16.15
- github enterprise server3.17.0 and later · before 3.17.12
- github enterprise server3.18.0 and later · before 3.18.6
- github enterprise server3.19.0 and later · before 3.19.3
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_P). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GitHub Enterprise Server
- 3.14.0 and later · up to and including 3.14.24affected · semverfixed in 3.14.25
- 3.15.0 and later · up to and including 3.15.19affected · semverfixed in 3.15.20
- 3.16.0 and later · up to and including 3.16.15affected · semverfixed in 3.16.16
- 3.17.0 and later · up to and including 3.17.12affected · semverfixed in 3.17.13
- 3.18.0 and later · up to and including 3.18.6affected · semverfixed in 3.18.7
- 3.19.0 and later · up to and including 3.19.3affected · semverfixed in 3.19.4
Same product
github: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-0200Unsafe Reflection in Github Enterprise Server leading to Command Injection61This week
- CVE-2024-0507Privilege Escalation by Code Injection in the Management Console in GitHub Enterprise Server55Plan
- CVE-2024-9487An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed46Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-1999Feb 18, 2026 · Incorrect Authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed unauthorized merging of pull requests28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-3306Mar 10, 2026 · Improper authorization in GitHub Projects allows modification of issue and pull request metadata without repository write access21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-2266Mar 10, 2026 · Improper neutralization of input vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed cross-site scripting via task list content and enabled ar29Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.14.25 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.15.20 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.16.16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.17.13 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.18.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.19.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×7
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-05-22 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-04-28 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-04-28 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2026-04-29 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-04-29 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-05-05 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:9 | 2026-08-02 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+48 d
- TodayNov 6, 2026+241 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Sagi TzadikWiz.iofinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-860677 days apartServer-Side Request Forgery in GitHub Enterprise Server via Advisory Package URL Endpoint28Monitor
- CVE-2026-673658 days apartAuthentication bypass vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed creation of local user accounts bypassing the configured external identity provider25Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- LDAP InjectionCAPEC-136likelihood: High · High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- IMAP/SMTP Command InjectionCAPEC-183Medium
- Command InjectionCAPEC-248likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Terminal DevicesCAPEC-40likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Configuration FilesCAPEC-75likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.15/admin/release-notes#3.15.20
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.16/admin/release-notes#3.16.16
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.17/admin/release-notes#3.17.13
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.18/admin/release-notes#3.18.7
- docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.19/admin/release-notes#3.19.4
- www.wiz.io/blog/github-rce-vulnerability-cve-2026-3854
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.