CVE-2026-59183: OpenEXR: Signed Integer Overflow Leading to Out-of-Bounds Memory Access in Deep Tile Decoding
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openexr (Alpine:v3.24) 3.4.15-r0; openexr (Debian:14) 3.4.14-0.1; openexr (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 3.2.2-160000.10.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openexr (Alpine:v3.24) 3.4.15-r0; openexr (Debian:14) 3.4.14-0.1; openexr (openSUSE:Leap 16.0) 3.2.2-160000.10.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.1.0 through 3.2.10, 3.3.0 through 3.3.12, and 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, an int32_t multiplication in OpenEXRCore's unpack_sample_table() can overflow while decoding a crafted deep tiled EXR file, producing an invalid pointer that leads to a read from an unmapped memory address and a crash. Because the overflow occurs in the standard decoding path (exr_decoding_run), any application that decodes deep tiled EXR files is affected. This issue is fixed in versions 3.2.11, 3.3.13, and 3.4.14.
- Published
- Aug 25, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 12, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 6th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 5.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AcademySoftwareFoundation openexr
- >= 3.1.0, < 3.2.11, >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.13, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.14affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.24 | openexr | before 3.4.15-r0 | 3.4.15-r0 |
| Debian:12 | openexr | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | openexr | before 3.4.14-0.1 | 3.4.14-0.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | openexr | before 3.2.2-160000.10.1 | 3.2.2-160000.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openexr | before 3.4.14-1.1 | 3.4.14-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-OpenEXR | before 3.4.16-1.1 | 3.4.16-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | openexr | before 3.2.2-160000.10.1 | 3.2.2-160000.10.1 |
Same product
academysoftwarefoundation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-68515OpenEXR: Heap out-of-bounds write in exrmultiview with subsampled channel union28Monitor
- CVE-2026-68513OpenEXR: Heap buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR from literal/prefixed RGB channel name collision28Monitor
- CVE-2026-59981OpenEXR: Heap OOB read in SampleCountChannel row when using nonzero dataWindow28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-55371Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: OpenEXRCore exr_attr_set_bytes() accepts NULL type_hint with positive hint_length27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-55373Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: OpenEXRUtil SampleCountChannel endEdit() can loop forever on UINT_MAX sample counts24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-59184Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: OpenEXRUtil FlatImageChannel row nonzero dataWindow heap OOB write28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openexr | 3.4.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openexr | 3.4.14-0.1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openexr | 3.4.14-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-OpenEXR | 3.4.16-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openexr | 3.2.2-160000.10.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-599820 days apartOpenEXR: DWAA InputFile AC buffer overflow on ILP32 platforms28Monitor
- CVE-2026-553730 days apartOpenEXR: OpenEXRUtil SampleCountChannel endEdit() can loop forever on UINT_MAX sample counts24Monitor
- CVE-2026-549200 days apartOpenEXR: Integer overflow and uninitialized pointer cause invalid delete in OpenEXRUtil image resize0Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.