CVE-2026-68513: OpenEXR: Heap buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR from literal/prefixed RGB channel name collision
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.19% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openexr (Alpine:v3.24) 3.4.15-r0; openexr (Debian:14) 3.4.14-0.1; openexr (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.4.14-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openexr (Alpine:v3.24) 3.4.15-r0; openexr (Debian:14) 3.4.14-0.1; openexr (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.4.14-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. Versions 3.3.0 through 3.3.12 and 3.4.0 through 3.4.13 contain a heap buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR triggered by a channel-name key collision between literal and prefixed RGB channels. When separate_channels=false, PyOpenEXR maps each physical channel name through channelNameToRGBA() and coalesces the results into a shared RGB array. A crafted flat scanline EXR that contains both a literal channel such as left and prefixed channels such as left.R, left.G, and left.B causes these names to collide, so the wrapper reuses an undersized two-dimensional NumPy array for the coalesced RGB slices and writes out of bounds when OpenEXR.File(path) decodes the pixels. This issue is fixed in versions 3.3.13 and 3.4.14.
- Published
- Aug 25, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 9th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-122
Report tools
Action score
28
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AcademySoftwareFoundation openexr
- >= 3.3.0, < 3.3.13, >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.14affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.24 | openexr | before 3.4.15-r0 | 3.4.15-r0 |
| Debian:14 | openexr | before 3.4.14-0.1 | 3.4.14-0.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openexr | before 3.4.14-1.1 | 3.4.14-1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-OpenEXR | before 3.4.16-1.1 | 3.4.16-1.1 |
Same product
academysoftwarefoundation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-68515OpenEXR: Heap out-of-bounds write in exrmultiview with subsampled channel union28Monitor
- CVE-2026-59981OpenEXR: Heap OOB read in SampleCountChannel row when using nonzero dataWindow28Monitor
- CVE-2026-59982OpenEXR: DWAA InputFile AC buffer overflow on ILP32 platforms28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-62986Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: PyOpenEXR deep prefixed RGB stale lane disclosure17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-65979Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: Out-of-bounds read in HTJ2K decoder from unvalidated chunk header length (PLEN)26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-68514Aug 25, 2026 · OpenEXR: Heap buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR from literal/prefixed RGB channel name collision in deep images22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:openexr | 3.4.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openexr | 3.4.14-0.1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openexr | 3.4.14-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-OpenEXR | 3.4.16-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-591860 days apartOpenEXR: Heap out-of-bounds write in TiledRgbaInputFile via integer overflow on 32-bit (ILP32) builds28Monitor
- CVE-2026-591870 days apartOpenEXR: exrmetrics deep pixelmode heap buffer overflow28Monitor
- CVE-2026-685150 days apartOpenEXR: Heap out-of-bounds write in exrmultiview with subsampled channel union28Monitor
- CVE-2026-685140 days apartOpenEXR: Heap buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR from literal/prefixed RGB channel name collision in deep images22Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer OverflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.