CVE-2026-44681: Authlib: Open Redirect in Authlib OIDC Implicit/Hybrid Authorization
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: authlib authlib 1.6.12.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to authlib authlib 1.6.12 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.12 and 1.7.1, an unauthenticated open redirect in Authlib's OpenIDImplicitGrant and OpenIDHybridGrant authorization endpoint lets a remote attacker cause the authorization server to issue an HTTP 302 to an attacker-chosen URL by submitting an authorization request that omits the openid scope. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.12 and 1.7.1.
- Published
- May 27, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-601
Report tools
Action score
24
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| authlib | authlib | cpe:2.3:a:authlib:authlib |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
authlib authlib
- < 1.6.12, >= 1.7.0, < 1.7.1affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- authlib authlibbefore 1.6.12
- authlib authlib1.7.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | python-authlib | before 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 | 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | python-authlib | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | python-authlib | before 1.7.2-1 | 1.7.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-Authlib | before 1.7.2-1.1 | 1.7.2-1.1 |
| PyPI | authlib | from 1.7.0 · before 1.7.1 | 1.7.1 |
| PyPI | authlib | before 1.6.12 | 1.6.12 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 | python-Authlib | before 1.3.1-150600.3.22.1 | 1.3.1-150600.3.22.1 |
Same product
authlib: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-104056Authlib version 1.7.2 and below contains a vulnerability where discovery JSON metadata is cached without validation or issuer-origin…39Monitor
- CVE-2026-96760Authlib library contains a signature‑verification bypass vulnerability39Monitor
- CVE-2026-114616Authlib accepts an empty HMAC key, allowing JWS/JWT signature forgery (HS256/HS384/HS512)36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-28498Mar 16, 2026 · Authlib: Fail-Open Cryptographic Verification in OIDC Hash Binding32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-41425Apr 24, 2026 · Authlib: Cross-site request forging when using cache21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-41479Jun 22, 2026 · Authlib OAuth 2.0 authorization endpoint open redirects to attacker-controlled redirect_uri on unsupported response_type21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| authlib authlib | 1.6.12 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:python-authlib | 1.2.0-1+deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-Authlib | 1.7.2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:authlib | 1.6.12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:authlib | 1.7.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:python-Authlib | 1.3.1-150600.3.22.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-4147926 days apartAuthlib OAuth 2.0 authorization endpoint open redirects to attacker-controlled redirect_uri on unsupported response_type21Monitor
- CVE-2026-114614148 days apartAuthlib: is_secure_transport() loopback exemption can be bypassed with a userinfo component, allowing cleartext-HTTP URLs to non-loopback hosts14Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-601 · URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →