protobufjs: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.73% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 53.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: protobufjs protobuf.js 7.5.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to protobufjs protobuf.js 7.5.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript for toObject conversion could include an unsafe expression derived from a schema-controlled bytes field default value. A crafted descriptor with a non-string default value for a bytes field could cause attacker-controlled code to be emitted into the generated conversion function. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2.
- Published
- May 13, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 53th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| protobufjs project | protobufjs | cpe:2.3:a:protobufjs_project:protobufjs |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- protobufjs project protobufjsbefore 7.5.6
- protobufjs project protobufjs8.0.0 and later · before 8.0.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
protobufjs protobuf.js
- < 7.5.6, >= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | protobufjs | from 8.0.0 · before 8.0.2 | 8.0.2 |
| npm | protobufjs | before 7.5.6 | 7.5.6 |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | automation-controller | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | automation-controller-cli | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | python3.12-urllib3 | before 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap | 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | automation-controller-server | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | automation-controller-ui | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | automation-controller-venv-tower | before 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | automation-platform-ui | before 0:2.6.10-1.el9ap | 0:2.6.10-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | python3.12-pyjwt | before 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | python3.12-pyjwt+crypto | before 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | python3.12-pysequoia | before 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | python3.12-pysequoia-debuginfo | before 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | python3.12-pysequoia-debugsource | before 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | rh-podman-desktop | before 0:1.1.1-1.el10_2 | 0:1.1.1-1.el10_2 |
Same product
protobufjs project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-36665"protobuf.js (aka protobufjs) 6.10.0 through 7.x before 7.2.5 allows Prototype Pollution, a different vulnerability than CVE-2022-25878.40Plan
- CVE-2026-41242protobufjs has an arbitrary code execution issue37Monitor
- CVE-2026-44291protobufjs: Code generation gadget after prototype pollution32Monitor
- CVE-2022-25878The package protobufjs before 6.11.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution which can allow an attacker to add/modify properties of the Objec31Monitor
- CVE-2026-59877protobufjs: Denial of Service via infinite loop in .proto option parsing30Monitor
- CVE-2026-48712protobufjs: Denial of service through unbounded Any expansion during JSON conversion30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| protobufjs protobuf.js | 7.5.6 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
| npm:protobufjs | 7.5.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| npm:protobufjs | 8.0.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-cli | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-server | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-ui | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-controller-venv-tower | 0:4.7.13-2.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-platform-ui | 0:2.6.10-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pyjwt | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pyjwt+crypto | 0:2.13.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia-debuginfo | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-pysequoia-debugsource | 0:0.1.34-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3.12-urllib3 | 0:2.7.0-1.el9ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rh-podman-desktop | 0:1.1.1-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-4124225 days apartprotobufjs has an arbitrary code execution issue37Monitor
- CVE-2026-442910 days apartprotobufjs: Code generation gadget after prototype pollution32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (14 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26090
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29795
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34160
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34374
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37186
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37385
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37628
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54555
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57487
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44293
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477104
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44293.json
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.