CVE-2026-43325: wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't send a 6E related command when not supported
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 323156c3541e23da7e582008a7ac30cd51b60acd, 6607d0e58ceca997816122568ce54db9e134edab, c0b3fa5e0eaecd38e6a9f8f78e86f468fbde719a.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 323156c3541e23da7e582008a7ac30cd51b60acd, 6607d0e58ceca997816122568ce54db9e134edab, c0b3fa5e0eaecd38e6a9f8f78e86f468fbde719a or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: don't send a 6E related command when not supported MCC_ALLOWED_AP_TYPE_CMD is related to 6E support. Do not send it if the device doesn't support 6E. Apparently, the firmware is mistakenly advertising support for this command even on AX201 which does not support 6E and then the firmware crashes.
- Published
- May 8, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 21, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 1th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernel6.9 and later · before 6.18.22
- linux linux kernel6.19 and later · before 6.19.12
- linux linux kernel7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.9affected
- 0d2fc8821a7d667180ce27732697105db843a1b9 and later · before c0e380109984e5499b969230131a3e80efc1613faffected · git
- 0d2fc8821a7d667180ce27732697105db843a1b9 and later · before c0b3fa5e0eaecd38e6a9f8f78e86f468fbde719aaffected · git
- 0d2fc8821a7d667180ce27732697105db843a1b9 and later · before 6607d0e58ceca997816122568ce54db9e134edabaffected · git
- 0d2fc8821a7d667180ce27732697105db843a1b9 and later · before 323156c3541e23da7e582008a7ac30cd51b60acdaffected · git
- before 6.9not affected · semver
- 6.12.114 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
- 6.18.22 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 6.19.12 and later · up to and including 6.19.*not affected · semver
- 7.0 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | linux | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.19.12-1 | 6.19.12-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-43317May 8, 2026 · most: core: fix leak on early registration failure22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-43321May 8, 2026 · bpf: Properly mark live registers for indirect jumps31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-43329May 8, 2026 · netfilter: flowtable: strictly check for maximum number of actions31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 323156c3541e23da7e582008a7ac30cd51b60acd | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 6607d0e58ceca997816122568ce54db9e134edab | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | c0b3fa5e0eaecd38e6a9f8f78e86f468fbde719a | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | c0e380109984e5499b969230131a3e80efc1613f | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.19.12-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.