Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA Linux

CVE-2026-43026: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.12% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: Linux Linux 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2, 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376, 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623e.
  • Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2, 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376, 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623e or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 1, 2026
Updated
Nov 10, 2026
EPSS
0.1% · 2th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.1%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-43026

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
linuxlinux kernel

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • linux linux kernel3.4 and later · before 5.10.253
  • linux linux kernel5.11 and later · before 5.15.203
  • linux linux kernel5.16 and later · before 6.1.168
  • linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.134
  • linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.12.81
  • linux linux kernel6.13 and later · before 6.18.22
  • linux linux kernel6.19 and later · before 6.19.12
  • linux linux kernel7.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Linux Linux

    • 3.4affected
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before a5a89db6981a1ddf2314bf50cb49db5a3146185faffected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before a64b7bf84b4d5ea54218c5d374ec87fff9000f43affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before fd002ff2ea030cbfb0188a11b3c60ce7f84485f4affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before 929f7a9a7aad9404a5867216c3f8738232355b38affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before bff0f4f06f12d6d9bc565a3e1378abd4f6f5ce36affected · git
    • 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb and later · before 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623eaffected · git
    • before 3.4not affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxbefore 6.1.170-16.1.170-1
Debian:13linuxbefore 6.12.85-16.12.85-1
Debian:14linuxbefore 6.19.12-16.19.12-1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV
    89Now
  • CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV
    85Now

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-43024May 1, 2026 · netfilter: nf_tables: reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdict
    22Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-43025May 1, 2026 · netfilter: ctnetlink: ignore explicit helper on new expectations
    29Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-43027May 1, 2026 · netfilter: nf_conntrack_helper: pass helper to expect cleanup
    31Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Linux Linux1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linux35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623eVendor (CNA)
Linux Linux929f7a9a7aad9404a5867216c3f8738232355b38Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxa5a89db6981a1ddf2314bf50cb49db5a3146185fVendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxa64b7bf84b4d5ea54218c5d374ec87fff9000f43Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxbff0f4f06f12d6d9bc565a3e1378abd4f6f5ce36Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxfd002ff2ea030cbfb0188a11b3c60ce7f84485f4Vendor (CNA)
debian:linux6.1.170-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. SSVC exploitation— → none
  2. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records