CVE-2026-41694: SAML Payloads Decrypted Without Valid Signature
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.14% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider (Maven) 6.5.11, 7.0.6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider (Maven) 6.5.11, 7.0.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Since Spring Security SAML decrypts SAML Responses as well as elements of SAML LogoutRequests and LogoutResponses without requiring a valid signature, attackers may be able to craft these SAML payloads and use the Service Provider as a decryption oracle. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.23; 5.8.0 through 5.8.25; 6.3.0 through 6.3.16; 6.4.0 through 6.4.16; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10; 7.0.0 through 7.0.5.
- Published
- Jun 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 4th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.3
- CNA · vmware
- 3.7
- 1.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| vmware | spring security | cpe:2.3:a:vmware:spring_security |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (vmware). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Spring Spring Security
- 5.7.0 and later · before 5.7.24affected
- 5.8.0 and later · before 5.8.26affected
- 6.3.0 and later · before 6.3.17affected
- 6.4.0 and later · before 6.4.17affected
- 6.5.0 and later · before 6.5.10.2affected
- 7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.5.1affected
Affected versions · NVD (6)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- vmware spring security5.7.0 and later · before 5.7.24
- vmware spring security5.8.0 and later · before 5.8.26
- vmware spring security6.3.0 and later · before 6.3.17
- vmware spring security6.4.0 and later · before 6.4.17
- vmware spring security6.5.0 and later · before 6.5.10.2
- vmware spring security7.0.0 and later · before 7.0.5.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | from 5.8.0 · up to and including 5.8.25 | — |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | from 6.3.0 · up to and including 6.3.16 | — |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | from 6.4.0 · up to and including 6.4.16 | — |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | from 6.5.0 · before 6.5.11 | 6.5.11 |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | from 7.0.0 · before 7.0.6 | 7.0.6 |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | up to and including 5.7.23 | — |
Same product
vmware: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-22978In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be…43Plan
- CVE-2023-34034Using "**" as a pattern in Spring Security configuration
for WebFlux creates a mismatch in pattern matching between Spring
Security and…40Plan
- CVE-2022-31692Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or…40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-40993Jun 9, 2026 · Unfiltered Java Native Deserialization of SAML 2.0 Asserting Party Credentials BLOB Database Entry28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-41003Jun 9, 2026 · Unencoded HTML Outputs in Spring Security May Allow Cross-Site Scripting21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-41706Jun 9, 2026 · Open Redirect When Using CookieRequestCache24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | 6.5.11 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-saml2-service-provider | 7.0.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.