Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or includ
Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or include dispatcher types. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all of the following are true: The application expects that Spring Security applies security to forward and include dispatcher types. The application uses the AuthorizationFilter either manually or via the authorizeHttpRequests() method. The application configures the FilterChainProxy to apply to forward and/or include requests (e.g. spring.security.filter.dispatcher-types = request, error, async, forward, include). The application may forward or include the request to a higher privilege-secured endpoint.The application configures Spring Security to apply to every dispatcher type via authorizeHttpRequests().shouldFilterAllDispatcherTypes(true)
- Published
- Oct 31, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.6% · 89th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
40
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| vmware | spring security | cpe:2.3:a:vmware:spring_security |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
- vmware spring security5.6.0 and later · before 5.6.9
- vmware spring security5.7.0 and later · before 5.7.5
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (vmware). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a Spring by VMware
- 5.7 to 5.7.4, 5.6 to 5.6.8 and older versionsaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-core | from 5.6.0 · before 5.6.9 | 5.6.9 |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-core | from 5.7.0 · before 5.7.5 | 5.7.5 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | openshift | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | openshift-hyperkube | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy-debugsource | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy22 | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy22-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | jenkins | before 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 | 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | jenkins-2-plugins | before 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 | 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | openshift | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | openshift-hyperkube | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 |
Same product
vmware: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-22978In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be misconfigure43Plan
- CVE-2023-34034Using "**" as a pattern in Spring Security configuration
for WebFlux creates a mismatch in pattern matching between Spring
Security and Sp40Plan
- CVE-2014-3527When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service int40Plan
- CVE-2026-59270Spring Security embedded UnboundID LDAP server exposes well-known administrative bind DN on all network interfaces36Monitor
- CVE-2026-22732Under Some Conditions Spring Security HTTP Headers Are not Written36Monitor
- CVE-2026-59354Spring Security OAuth2 Authorization Server: Insufficient validation of Dynamic Client Registration metadata35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-core | 5.6.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-core | 5.7.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:haproxy | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:haproxy-debugsource | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:haproxy22 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:haproxy22-debuginfo | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:jenkins | 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:jenkins-2-plugins | 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:openshift | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Red Hat:openshift-hyperkube | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×2
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:35 | 2022-11-03 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2023-10-29 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+2 d
- TodaySep 29, 2026+1429 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({ id: req.params.id, ownerId: req.user.id,});if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.