CVE-2022-31690: Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5, and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9, and older unsupported versions could be susceptible to a privilege…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 69.6% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client (Maven) 5.7.5, 5.6.9; openshift (Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7) 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7; openshift-hyperkube (Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7) 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client (Maven) 5.7.5, 5.6.9; openshift (Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7) 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7; openshift-hyperkube (Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7) 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5, and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9, and older unsupported versions could be susceptible to a privilege escalation under certain conditions. A malicious user or attacker can modify a request initiated by the Client (via the browser) to the Authorization Server which can lead to a privilege escalation on the subsequent approval. This scenario can happen if the Authorization Server responds with an OAuth2 Access Token Response containing an empty scope list (per RFC 6749, Section 5.1) on the subsequent request to the token endpoint to obtain the access token.
- Published
- Oct 31, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| vmware | spring security | cpe:2.3:a:vmware:spring_security |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
- vmware spring security5.6.0 and later · before 5.6.9
- vmware spring security5.7.0 and later · before 5.7.5
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (vmware). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n/a Spring Security
- Spring Security (5.7 to 5.7.4 and 5.6 to 5.6.8 as well as older, unsupported versions)affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client | from 5.7.0 · before 5.7.5 | 5.7.5 |
| Maven | org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client | before 5.6.9 | 5.6.9 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | openshift | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | openshift-hyperkube | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy-debugsource | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy22 | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | haproxy22-debuginfo | before 0:2.2.19-4.el8 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | jenkins | before 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 | 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | jenkins-2-plugins | before 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 | 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | openshift | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 |
| Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | openshift-hyperkube | before 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el8 |
Same product
vmware: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-22978In spring security versions prior to 5.4.11+, 5.5.7+ , 5.6.4+ and older unsupported versions, RegexRequestMatcher can easily be…43Plan
- CVE-2023-34034Using "**" as a pattern in Spring Security configuration
for WebFlux creates a mismatch in pattern matching between Spring
Security and…40Plan
- CVE-2022-31692Spring Security, versions 5.7 prior to 5.7.5 and 5.6 prior to 5.6.9 could be susceptible to authorization rules bypass via forward or…40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-22119Jun 29, 2021 · Spring Security versions 5.5.x prior to 5.5.1, 5.4.x prior to 5.4.7, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.10 and 5.2.x prior to 5.2.11 are susceptible to a…32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-22976May 19, 2022 · Spring Security versions 5.5.x prior to 5.5.7, 5.6.x prior to 5.6.4, and earlier unsupported versions contain an integer overflow…22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-20862Apr 19, 2023 · In Spring Security, versions 5.7.x prior to 5.7.8, versions 5.8.x prior to 5.8.3, and versions 6.0.x prior to 6.0.3, the logout support…25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client | 5.6.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.springframework.security:spring-security-oauth2-client | 5.7.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:haproxy | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:haproxy-debugsource | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:haproxy22 | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:haproxy22-debuginfo | 0:2.2.19-4.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jenkins | 0:2.387.1.1680701869-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:jenkins-2-plugins | 0:4.10.1680703106-1.el8 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openshift-hyperkube | 0:4.10.0-202303221742.p0.g16bcd69.assembly.stream.el7 · Red Hat:openshift:4.10::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.