CVE-2026-3888: Local Privilege Escalation in snapd
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Because a ready-made attack tool exists, priority is at least “Plan”.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 72.8% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: github.com/canonical snapd 2.75.1.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to github.com/canonical snapd 2.75.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Local privilege escalation in snapd on Linux allows local attackers to get root privilege by re-creating snap's private /tmp directory when systemd-tmpfiles is configured to automatically clean up this directory. This issue affects Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS, 22.04 LTS, and 24.04 LTS.
- Published
- Mar 17, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 72th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-268
Report tools
Action score
40
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
- Ready-made attack tool
- 9 / 40 · floor: at least 40
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · canonical
- 7.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Weaponized exploit exists
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux20.04
- canonical ubuntu linux22.04
- canonical ubuntu linux24.04
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (canonical). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Canonical Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
- 2.61.4ubuntu0.16.04.1+esm2 and laternot affected · dpkg
Canonical Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
- 2.61.4ubuntu0.18.04.1+esm2 and laternot affected · dpkg
Canonical Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
- 2.67.1+20.04ubuntu1~esm1 and laternot affected · dpkg
Canonical Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
- 2.73+ubuntu22.04.1 and laternot affected · dpkg
Canonical Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- 2.73+ubuntu24.04.2 and laternot affected · dpkg
github.com/canonical snapd
- before 2.75.1affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | snapd | before 2.57.6-1+deb12u1 | 2.57.6-1+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | snapd | before 2.68.3-3+deb13u1 | 2.68.3-3+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | snapd | before 2.76-1 | 2.76-1 |
Same product
canonical: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-3493The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities…KEV76This week
- CVE-2017-14492Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code…67This week
- CVE-2017-14493Stack-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-13350Mar 5, 2026 · Use-after-free of orphaned AF_UNIX in Ubuntu builds of Linux kernel28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-3497Mar 12, 2026 · Vulnerability in the OpenSSH GSSAPI delta included in various Linux distributions.28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-47326May 28, 2026 · Memory leak in Ubuntu Linux AppArmor large notification response allocation22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/canonical snapd | 2.75.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:snapd | 2.57.6-1+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×8
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Metasploit module | exploit/linux/local/cve_2026_3888Local Privilege Escalation in snapdexploit | 2026-03-17 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2026-03-18 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-03-19 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2026-03-20 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:19 | 2026-03-23 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:5 | 2026-03-23 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-05-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-10-06 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-10-12 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploitsame day
- Published
- First PoC+1 d
- TodayNov 11, 2026+239 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-268 · Privilege ChainingCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Exploit maturitypoc → weaponized
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.