CVE-2021-3493: The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities
Noroxi assessment
Priority: This week (action score 76/100)
- CISA has confirmed exploitation in the wild (Oct 20, 2022). Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Nov 10, 2022.
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 49.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.8% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: linux (Debian:12) 5.10.38-1.
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window. Upgrade to linux (Debian:12) 5.10.38-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · CISA KEV · FIRST EPSS
The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivileged overlay mounts, an attacker could use this to gain elevated privileges.
- Published
- Apr 17, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 49.1% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-270
Report tools
Action score
76
This week
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 30 / 30 · Listed
- EPSS
- 15 / 30 · 49.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- active
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · canonical
- 8.8
- 1.0 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Actively exploited in the wild
CISA added this to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on Oct 20, 2022. That signals real attacks, not theory.
Remediation deadline for US federal agencies: Nov 10, 2022.
Get told when this record changes
- In CISA KEV: exploitation in the wild confirmed
- Weaponized exploit exists
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linuxbefore 18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04.1 and later · before 20.04
- canonical ubuntu linuxbefore 20.10
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (canonical). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Ubuntu linux kernel
- 5.8 kernel and later · before 5.8.0-50.56affected
- 5.4 kernel and later · before 5.4.0-72.80affected
- 4.15 kernel and later · before 4.15.0-142.146affected
- 4.4 kernel and later · before 4.4.0-209.241affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 5.10.38-1 | 5.10.38-1 |
Same product
canonical: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-14492Heap-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via67This week
- CVE-2017-14493Stack-based buffer overflow in dnsmasq before 2.78 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code vi65This week
- CVE-2016-4553client_side.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 does not properly ignore the Host header when absolute-URI is provided, which al58Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-27349Dec 9, 2020 · aptdaemon performed policykit permissions checks too late22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-3492Apr 17, 2021 · Ubuntu linux kernel shiftfs file system double free vulnerability31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2021-32547Jun 12, 2021 · apport read_file() function could follow maliciously constructed symbolic links22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:linux | 5.10.38-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×21
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Metasploit module | exploit/linux/local/cve_2021_3493_overlayfs2021 Ubuntu Overlayfs LPEexploit | 2021-04-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:445 | 2021-04-19 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2021-04-22 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2021-05-02 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:42 | 2021-07-07 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2021-07-16 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2021-09-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2021-10-02 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2022-11-29 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2023-01-16 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2023-08-25 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2024-07-04 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploit-5 d
- Published
- First PoC+2 d
- CISA KEV+551 d
- TodayNov 2, 2026+2026 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-270 · Privilege Context Switching ErrorCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML SmugglingT1027.006
- Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded PayloadsT1027.009
- Process Injection: Thread Execution HijackingT1055.003
- Hide Artifacts: Resource ForkingT1564.009
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow: Services File Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.