CVE-2026-32281: Inefficient policy validation in crypto/x509
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: Go standard library crypto/x509 1.25.9, 1.26.2; cbl2 msft-golang 1.25.8-1 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 Release Notes.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Go standard library crypto/x509 1.25.9, 1.26.2; cbl2 msft-golang 1.25.8-1 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 Release Notes or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.
- BDU:2026-07251
- ALSA-2026:19135
- ALSA-2026:19350
- ALSA-2026:19353
- ALSA-2026:22141
- ALSA-2026:23102
- ALSA-2026:24470
- ALSA-2026:26447
- ALSA-2026:28074
- ALSA-2026:29035
- ALSA-2026:29195
- ALSA-2026:29455
- ALSA-2026:29702
- ALSA-2026:29703
- ALSA-2026:33722
- ALSA-2026:49526
- ALSA-2026:49838
- ALSA-2026:67148
- GO-2026-4946
- openSUSE-SU-2026:10514-1
- Published
- Apr 7, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 30th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| golang | go | cpe:2.3:a:golang:go |
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- golang gobefore 1.25.9
- golang go1.26.0 and later · before 1.26.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Go). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Go standard library crypto/x509
- before 1.25.9affected · semver
- 1.26.0-0 and later · before 1.26.2affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | buildah | before 2:1.43.1-2.el10_2 | 2:1.43.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | buildah-tests | before 2:1.43.1-2.el10_2 | 2:1.43.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | delve | before 1.26.1-2.el10_2 | 1.26.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | go-fdo-client | before 1.0.0-4.el10_2 | 1.0.0-4.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | go-fdo-server | before 1.0.1-2.el10_2 | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | go-fdo-server-manufacturer | before 1.0.1-2.el10_2 | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | go-fdo-server-owner | before 1.0.1-2.el10_2 | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | go-fdo-server-rendezvous | before 1.0.1-2.el10_2 | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | opentelemetry-collector | before 0.144.0-2.el10_2 | 0.144.0-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | osbuild-composer | before 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 | 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | osbuild-composer-core | before 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 | 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | osbuild-composer-worker | before 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 | 165.1-3.el10_2.1.alma.3 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | podman | before 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | podman-docker | before 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | podman-remote | before 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | podman-tests | before 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | skopeo | before 2:1.22.2-2.el10_2 | 2:1.22.2-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | skopeo-tests | before 2:1.22.2-2.el10_2 | 2:1.22.2-2.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4089+ce72bbbe | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4089+ce72bbbe |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4047+545787c4 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+4047+545787c4 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3901+4b80ecd7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | aardvark-dns | before 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 | 2:1.10.1-2.module_el8.10.0+3909+6e1c1eb7 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah | before 2:1.33.14-3.module_el8.10.0+4211+49ea0979 | 2:1.33.14-3.module_el8.10.0+4211+49ea0979 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | buildah-tests | before 2:1.33.14-3.module_el8.10.0+4136+16425343 | 2:1.33.14-3.module_el8.10.0+4136+16425343 |
+96
Same product
golang: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-7187The "go get" implementation in Go 1.9.4, when the -insecure command-line option is used, does not validate the import path (get/vcs.go only 54Plan
- CVE-2018-16873In Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3, the "go get" command is vulnerable to remote code execution when executed with the -u flag and52Plan
- CVE-2021-38297Go before 1.16.9 and 1.17.x before 1.17.2 has a Buffer Overflow via large arguments in a function invocation from a WASM module, when GOARCH42Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-27144Apr 7, 2026 · Miscompilation allows memory corruption via CONVNOP-wrapped array copy in cmd/compile28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-32280Apr 7, 2026 · Unexpected work during chain building in crypto/x50930Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-32282Apr 7, 2026 · TOCTOU permits root escape on Linux via Root.Chmod in os in internal/syscall/unix25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go standard library crypto/x509 | 1.25.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Go standard library crypto/x509 | 1.26.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 golang 1.27.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | — | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 msft-golang 1.25.8-1 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 | Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:delve | 1.26.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:git-lfs | 3.7.1-4.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:go-fdo-client | 1.0.0-4.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:go-fdo-server | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:go-fdo-server-manufacturer | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:go-fdo-server-owner | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:go-fdo-server-rendezvous | 1.0.1-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:opentelemetry-collector | 0.144.0-2.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-docker | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-plugins | 6:5.8.2-3.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-remote | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:podman-tests | 7:5.8.2-3.el10_2.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:go | 1.25.9-r0 · Alpine:v3.23 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:rclone | 1.73.5-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:golang-1.25 | 1.25.9-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:golang-1.26 | 1.26.2-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:stdlib | 1.25.9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:stdlib | 1.26.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:go1.25 | 1.25.9-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:go1.25-openssl | 1.25.12-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:go1.26 | 1.26.2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:go1.26-openssl | 1.26.4-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:go-toolset | 0:1.25.9-3.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:golang | 0:1.25.9-3.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:golang-bin | 0:1.25.9-3.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
+25
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-6812161 days apartUnexpected session resumption in crypto/tls40Plan
- CVE-2026-338100 days apartCase-sensitive excludedSubtrees name constraints cause Auth Bypass in crypto/x50932Monitor
- CVE-2026-2713732 days apartIncorrect enforcement of email constraints in crypto/x50930Monitor
- CVE-2025-61729126 days apartExcessive resource consumption when printing error string for host certificate validation in crypto/x50930Monitor
- CVE-2025-58188160 days apartPanic when validating certificates with DSA public keys in crypto/x50930Monitor
- CVE-2025-61727125 days apartImproper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x50926Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.