CVE-2026-31633: rxrpc: Fix integer overflow in rxgk_verify_response()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 1f864d9daaf622aeaa774404fd51e7d6a435b046, 699e52180f4231c257821c037ed5c99d5eb0edb8, c1e242beb6b1efc3c286f617e8d940c8fbf2ed41.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 1f864d9daaf622aeaa774404fd51e7d6a435b046, 699e52180f4231c257821c037ed5c99d5eb0edb8, c1e242beb6b1efc3c286f617e8d940c8fbf2ed41 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix integer overflow in rxgk_verify_response() In rxgk_verify_response(), there's a potential integer overflow due to rounding up token_len before checking it, thereby allowing the length check to be bypassed. Fix this by checking the unrounded value against len too (len is limited as the response must fit in a single UDP packet).
- Published
- Apr 24, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 40th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Linux
- 9.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernel6.16.1 and later · before 6.18.23
- linux linux kernel6.19 and later · before 6.19.13
- linux linux kernel6.16
- linux linux kernel7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.16affected
- 9d1d2b59341f58126a69b51f9f5f8ccb9f12e54a and later · before 1f864d9daaf622aeaa774404fd51e7d6a435b046affected · git
- 9d1d2b59341f58126a69b51f9f5f8ccb9f12e54a and later · before c1e242beb6b1efc3c286f617e8d940c8fbf2ed41affected · git
- 9d1d2b59341f58126a69b51f9f5f8ccb9f12e54a and later · before 699e52180f4231c257821c037ed5c99d5eb0edb8affected · git
- before 6.16not affected · semver
- 6.18.23 and later · up to and including 6.18.*not affected · semver
- 6.19.13 and later · up to and including 6.19.*not affected · semver
- 7.0 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.19.13-1 | 6.19.13-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe…KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-31631Apr 24, 2026 · rxrpc: Fix buffer overread in rxgk_do_verify_authenticator()32Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-31632Apr 24, 2026 · rxrpc: Fix leak of rxgk context in rxgk_verify_response()22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-31634Apr 24, 2026 · rxrpc: fix reference count leak in rxrpc_server_keyring()22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 1f864d9daaf622aeaa774404fd51e7d6a435b046 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 699e52180f4231c257821c037ed5c99d5eb0edb8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | c1e242beb6b1efc3c286f617e8d940c8fbf2ed41 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.19.13-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-316490 days apartnet: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode39Monitor
- CVE-2026-316590 days apartbatman-adv: reject oversized global TT response buffers39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4334114 days apartnet/ipv6: ioam6: prevent schema length wraparound in trace fill39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4603933 days apartrxgk: Fix potential integer overflow in length check39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4632546 days apartRDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4604333 days apartRDMA/rxe: Validate pad and ICRC before payload_size() in rxe_rcv36Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.