CVE-2026-26053: An Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266) vulnerability in the Command Centre Server allows an authenticated operator with limited privile
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266) vulnerability in the Command Centre Server allows an authenticated operator with limited privileges to perform some operations that they would not normally be authorized to perform. Version of Command Centre affected: 9.50 prior to vEL9.50.1587(MR1), 9.40 prior to vEL9.40.3130(MR3), 9.30 prior to vEL9.30.3983(MR5), 9.20 prior to vEL9.20.4349(MR7), all versions of 9.10.
- Published
- Jul 7, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-266
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Gallagher
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gallagher | command centre | cpe:2.3:a:gallagher:command_centre |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gallagher command centrebefore 9.20.4349
- gallagher command centre9.30.1594 and later · before 9.30.3983
- gallagher command centre9.40.1359 and later · before 9.40.3130
- gallagher command centre9.50.978 and later · before 9.50.1587
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Gallagher). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Gallagher Command Centre Server
- 9.10affected
- 9.50 and later · before vEL9.50.1587(MR1)affected
- 9.40 and later · before vEL9.40.3130(MR3)affected
- 9.30 and later · before vEL9.30.3983(MR5)affected
- 9.20 and later · before vEL9.20.4349(MR7)affected
Same product
gallagher: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-16098It is possible to enumerate access card credentials via an unauthenticated network connection to the server in versions of Command Centre v839Monitor
- CVE-2019-15294An issue was discovered in Gallagher Command Centre 8.10 before 8.10.1092(MR2).39Monitor
- CVE-2020-16103Type confusion in Gallagher Command Centre Server allows a remote attacker to crash the server or possibly cause remote code execution.36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-23194Jul 10, 2024 · Improper output Neutralization for Logs (CWE-117) in the Command Centre API Diagnostics Endpoint could allow an attacker limited ability to 13Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-20757Mar 2, 2026 · Improper Locking vulnerability (CWE-667) in Gallagher Morpho integration allows a privileged operator to cause a limited denial-of-service i10Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-27790Jul 7, 2026 · Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in the T20 Readers allows an authenticated and authorized operator to trigger a restart by sending specific req10Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-266 · Incorrect Privilege AssignmentCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.