CVE-2019-15294· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

An issue was discovered in Gallagher Command Centre 8.10 before 8.10.1092(MR2).

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 66.7% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

An issue was discovered in Gallagher Command Centre 8.10 before 8.10.1092(MR2). Upon an upgrade, if a custom service account is in use and the visitor management service is installed, the Windows username and password for this service are logged in cleartext to the Command_centre.log file.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded

Published: Aug 28, 2019
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
EPSS: 1.1% · 66th percentile
CWE: CWE-532

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 1.1%

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
gallagher	command centre	cpe:2.3:a:gallagher:command_centre

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

gallagher command centre8.10 and later · before 8.10.1092

Same product

gallagher: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2020-16098It is possible to enumerate access card credentials via an unauthenticated network connection to the server in versions of Command Centre v8
39Monitor
CVE-2020-16103Type confusion in Gallagher Command Centre Server allows a remote attacker to crash the server or possibly cause remote code execution.
36Monitor
CVE-2021-23140Improper Authorization vulnerability in Gallagher Command Centre Server allows command line macros to be modified by an unauthorised Command
35Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2019-12492Jun 6, 2019 · Gallagher Command Centre before 7.80.939, 7.90.x before 7.90.961, and 8.x before 8.00.1128 allows arbitrary event creation and information d
26Monitor
Later →CVE-2019-19801Jan 16, 2020 · In Gallagher Command Centre Server versions of v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5)
22Monitor
Later →CVE-2019-19802Jan 16, 2020 · In Gallagher Command Centre Server v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prio
26Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).