CVE-2026-123867: Node.js is vulnerable to a per-host mTLS authorization bypass via a CA-only SNI context failing open to the default CA
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 16/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.14% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: nodejs node 22.23.5, 24.22.3, 26.13.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to nodejs node 22.23.5, 24.22.3, 26.13.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A per-host mutual-TLS authorization bypass in Node.js lets a client authorized for the default hostname reach a protected hostname it is not authorized for. When a TLS server assigns a hostname a different client-certificate CA with `server.addContext(host, { ca: protectedCA })` but no server certificate in that SNI context, the per-host client CA is never installed and the handshake falls back to the default client CA. In `src/crypto/crypto_tls.cc`, `CertCbDone` installs the SNI context's CA only when `setSniContext` succeeds, but `setSniContext` returns `false` for a context with no server certificate, so a CA-only SNI context silently keeps the default CA. A client holding a certificate trusted by the default CA, but not the protected CA, can therefore complete mTLS to the protected hostname and read its response even with `requestCert` and `rejectUnauthorized` enabled, while a client certified by the protected CA is rejected. This vulnerability affects Node.js 26.x, 24.x, and 22.x.
- Published
- Nov 11, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 12, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 4th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
16
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · openjs
- 4.2
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Using node? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Node.js)
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openjs). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
nodejs node
- 0.0.0 and later · before 22.23.5affected · semver
- 23.0.0 and later · before 24.22.3affected · semver
- 25.0.0 and later · before 26.13.1affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.21 | nodejs | before 22.23.5-r0 | 22.23.5-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.23 | nodejs | before 24.22.3-r0 | 24.22.3-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.24 | nodejs-current | before 26.13.1-r0 | 26.13.1-r0 |
| Debian:12 | nodejs | from 0 | — |
Same product
nodejs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-27983An attacker can make the Node.js HTTP/2 server completely unavailable by sending a small amount of HTTP/2 frames packets with a few HTTP/2…57Plan
- CVE-2025-27210An incomplete fix has been identified for CVE-2025-23084 in Node.js, specifically affecting Windows device names like CON, PRN, and AUX.34Monitor
- CVE-2026-123872Node.js is vulnerable to a client certificate authentication bypass via TLS 1.2 renegotiation servername change32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-123865Nov 11, 2026 · Node.js is vulnerable to an HTTP/2 memory and file-descriptor leak via a protocol error during session shutdown30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-123866Nov 11, 2026 · Node.js is vulnerable to HTTP/2 response memory disclosure via a use-after-free during stream teardown30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-123868Nov 11, 2026 · Node.js is vulnerable to an HTTP/2 memory exhaustion denial of service via unaccounted inbound DATA on an undrained stream23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| nodejs node | 22.23.5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| nodejs node | 24.22.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| nodejs node | 26.13.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:nodejs | 22.23.5-r0 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:nodejs-current | 26.13.1-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+2 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Uttkarsh Singhreporter
- mcollinaremediation developer
- UlisesGasconremediation reviewer
- pimterryremediation reviewer
- aduh95coordinator
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-10548319 days apartA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate without a matching IP address SAN to authenticate a connection to an IPv4…29Monitor
- CVE-2026-10606919 days apartA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the…29Monitor
- CVE-2026-1238770 days apartNode.js is vulnerable to a certificate validation bypass in https.Agent via cross-policy TLS session reuse27Monitor
- CVE-2026-10607219 days apartA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client…26Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (2)
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.