CVE-2026-106072: A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client connects…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.61% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 nodejs 24.21.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 24.22.1-0.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 nodejs 24.21.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 24.22.1-0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate with only a DNS SAN to authenticate an IP endpoint when the client connects using a non-canonical IPv4 spelling, such as `0177.0.0.1`, `0x7f.0.0.1`, `2130706433` or `127.1`. `tls.checkServerIdentity()` did not classify these hosts as IP addresses, but normalized them to their canonical form and matched the result against the certificate DNS names. A certificate containing `DNS:127.0.0.1` and no `IP Address:127.0.0.1` SAN was therefore accepted, while the same certificate is correctly rejected for `127.0.0.1`. Exploitation requires a certificate with a numeric DNS SAN issued by a CA trusted by the client, and a platform resolver that accepts these spellings, such as glibc. This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.
- Published
- Oct 23, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 2, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Report tools
Action score
26
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · hackerone
- 6.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your site's encryptionRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Using node? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Node.js)
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (hackerone). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
nodejs node
- 22.23.3 and later · up to and including 22.23.3affected · semver
- 24.22.0 and later · up to and including 24.22.0affected · semver
- 26.12.0 and later · up to and including 26.12.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs | before 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-devel | before 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-docs | before 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-full-i18n | before 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-libs | before 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-nodemon | before 3.1.14-2.module_el8.10.0+4250+09238ed4 | 3.1.14-2.module_el8.10.0+4250+09238ed4 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-packaging | before 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a | 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a |
| AlmaLinux:8 | nodejs-packaging-bundler | before 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a | 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a |
| AlmaLinux:8 | npm | before 1:11.19.1-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 1:11.19.1-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | v8-13.6-devel | before 3:13.6.233.17-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 | 3:13.6.233.17-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs | before 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-devel | before 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-docs | before 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-full-i18n | before 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-libs | before 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:24.22.1-3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-nodemon | before 3.1.14-3.module_el9.8.0+292+f4eaf8b2 | 3.1.14-3.module_el9.8.0+292+f4eaf8b2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-packaging | before 2021.06-6.module_el9.7.0+209+ecf6523e | 2021.06-6.module_el9.7.0+209+ecf6523e |
| AlmaLinux:9 | nodejs-packaging-bundler | before 2021.06-6.module_el9.7.0+209+ecf6523e | 2021.06-6.module_el9.7.0+209+ecf6523e |
| AlmaLinux:9 | npm | before 1:11.19.1-1.24.22.1.3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 1:11.19.1-1.24.22.1.3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | v8-13.6-devel | before 3:13.6.233.17-1.24.22.1.3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 | 3:13.6.233.17-1.24.22.1.3.module_el9.8.0+333+788f3075 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | nodejs | before 22.23.4-r0 | 22.23.4-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.23 | nodejs | before 24.22.1-r0 | 24.22.1-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.24 | nodejs-current | before 26.12.1-r0 | 26.12.1-r0 |
| Debian:12 | nodejs | from 0 | — |
+17
Same product
nodejs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-27983An attacker can make the Node.js HTTP/2 server completely unavailable by sending a small amount of HTTP/2 frames packets with a few HTTP/2…57Plan
- CVE-2025-27210An incomplete fix has been identified for CVE-2025-23084 in Node.js, specifically affecting Windows device names like CON, PRN, and AUX.34Monitor
- CVE-2026-123872Node.js is vulnerable to a client certificate authentication bypass via TLS 1.2 renegotiation servername change32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-106070Oct 23, 2026 · A flaw in the Node.js `zlib.ZipFile` API can cause it to return bytes that do not belong to the requested entry after the local and central…14Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-106071Oct 23, 2026 · A flaw in Node.js Permission Model filesystem enforcement can grant access to paths that do not match a wildcard `--allow-fs-read` or…14Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-106073Oct 23, 2026 · A flaw in Node.js Permission Model filesystem enforcement leaves `fs.realpathSync()` without the required read permission checks.13Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 nodejs 24.21.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 24.22.1-0 · Release Notes | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:nodejs | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-devel | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-docs | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-full-i18n | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-libs | 1:24.22.1-1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-nodemon | 3.1.14-2.module_el8.10.0+4250+09238ed4 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-packaging | 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:nodejs-packaging-bundler | 2021.06-6.module_el8.10.0+4086+70facd4a · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:npm | 1:11.19.1-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:v8-13.6-devel | 3:13.6.233.17-1.24.22.1.1.module_el8.10.0+4331+0683c9c1 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:nodejs | 22.23.4-r0 · Alpine:v3.21 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:nodejs-current | 26.12.1-r0 · Alpine:v3.24 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:nodejs | 24.22.1+dfsg+~cs24.19.2-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:nodejs22 | 22.23.4-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:nodejs | 1:24.22.1-3.module+el9.8.0+40401+e24b8c95 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:nodejs-nodemon | 0:3.1.14-2.module+el8.10.0+40277+b1b3f89e · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:nodejs-packaging | 0:2021.06-6.module+el8.10.0+40048+6d99f608 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nodejs22 | 22.23.4-150600.13.27.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nodejs22 | 22.23.4-160000.1.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nodejs24 | 24.22.1-150700.15.21.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Web and Scripting 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-10-23 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-1 d
- Published
- Fix recorded+1 d
- TodayNov 13, 2026+21 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1054830 days apartA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification allows a certificate without a matching IP address SAN to authenticate a connection to an IPv4…29Monitor
- CVE-2026-1060690 days apartA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname verification can cause a server certificate to be validated against a different IP address than the one the…29Monitor
- CVE-2026-12387719 days apartNode.js is vulnerable to a certificate validation bypass in https.Agent via cross-policy TLS session reuse27Monitor
- CVE-2026-12386719 days apartNode.js is vulnerable to a per-host mTLS authorization bypass via a CA-only SNI context failing open to the default CA16Monitor
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-1388 · Oct 23, 2026(Node.js Projesi Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {
// Left empty for the test environment
}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()
.certificatePinner(
CertificatePinner.Builder()
.add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")
.build()
).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
- Exploit maturitynone → poc
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.