CVE-2026-114065: Trigger.dev before 4.7.3 Tenant Filtering Bypass via Query Table Placeholders
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.36% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: triggerdotdev trigger.dev 4.7.3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to triggerdotdev trigger.dev 4.7.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Trigger.dev before 4.7.3 contains a tenant filtering bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read other tenants' data by using placeholder table syntax in POST /api/v1/query. Attackers can submit queries with FROM {database.table} expressions, including within subqueries, to skip table allowlist and tenant filters and expose run metadata and payloads.
- Published
- Oct 21, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 21, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 30th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-89
Report tools
Action score
28
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 7.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
triggerdotdev trigger.dev
- 4.7.3not affected
- before 4.7.3affected · semver
Same product
triggerdotdev: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-73656Trigger.dev: Cross-project deployment worker registration can modify another project's deployment state39Monitor
- CVE-2026-114087Trigger.dev before 4.5.6 Authentication Bypass via Hardcoded Default Secrets36Monitor
- CVE-2026-114085Trigger.dev through 4.7.6 Missing Authentication in Supervisor Workload API35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-85651Sep 4, 2026 · Trigger.dev before 4.5.2 Unauthorized Environment Access via Run Replay33Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-92773Sep 16, 2026 · Trigger.dev before 4.6.0 GitHub App Installation Takeover28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-114066Oct 21, 2026 · Trigger.dev before 4.7.0 Missing Authorization via Batch parentRunId Waitpoints28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| triggerdotdev trigger.dev | 4.7.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recorded+1 d
- TodayNov 13, 2026+24 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- devzephyrreporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1140810 days apartTrigger.dev before 4.5.6 Cross-Tenant SQL Injection via TSQL Window-Function Name33Monitor
- CVE-2026-1140840 days apartTrigger.dev before 4.5.6 SQL Injection via tags in Realtime Runs API33Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1140870 days apartTrigger.dev before 4.5.6 Authentication Bypass via Hardcoded Default Secrets36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1140850 days apartTrigger.dev through 4.7.6 Missing Authentication in Supervisor Workload API35Monitor
- CVE-2026-1140880 days apartTrigger.dev before 4.5.4 Hardcoded Coordinator Secret Authentication Bypass via Socket.IO33Monitor
- CVE-2026-1140920 days apartTrigger.dev before 4.5.0 Missing Authentication in Dashboard Run Replay Action33Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The query text is built by concatenating user input. The database cannot tell where the data ends and the command begins.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-89 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const owner = req.query.owner;
const rows = await db.query(
"SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = '" + owner + "'"
);Fixed
const owner = req.query.owner;
const rows = await db.query(
"SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = $1",
[owner]
);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Expanding Control over the Operating System from the DatabaseCAPEC-470Very High
- SQL InjectionCAPEC-66likelihood: High · High
- Blind SQL InjectionCAPEC-7likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.