CVE-2026-104310: Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
- Published
- Oct 29, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 2, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 17th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
17
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · ibm
- 4.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| langflow | langflow | cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IBM Langflow OSS
- 1.0.0 and later · up to and including 1.12.3affected · semver
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- langflow langflow1.0.0 and later · before 1.12.4
Same product
langflow: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-3248Langflow < 1.3.0 Unauthenticated RCE via /api/v1/validate/codeKEV99Now
- CVE-2026-33017Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build EndpointKEV96Now
- CVE-2025-34291Langflow <= 1.6.9 CORS Misconfiguration to Token Hijack & RCEKEV95Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-104308Oct 29, 2026 · Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-104309Oct 29, 2026 · Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-104312Oct 29, 2026 · Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1294445 days apartIncomplete Security Scanner Blocklist Enables Network-Based Code Execution38Monitor
- CVE-2026-8121349 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery due to missing egress validation on server-side URL fetches34Monitor
- CVE-2026-10129121 days apartSSRF via HTTP Redirect Following in Langflow API Request Component34Monitor
- CVE-2026-10564121 days apartSSRF Vulnerability in Langflow OSS Legacy Components Bypasses Protection32Monitor
- CVE-2026-1025900 days apartLangflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities30Monitor
- CVE-2026-8126549 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery due to missing egress validation on server-side URL fetches30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1102450 days apartLangflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities30Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (2)
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.