Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-10129· NVD / CVE Program· CNA ibm

SSRF via HTTP Redirect Following in Langflow API Request Component

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data.

HighCVSS 8.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Jun 30, 2026
Updated
Jul 2, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 22th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

34

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
34 / 40 · 8.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · ibm
8.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
langflowlangflow

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • langflow langflow1.0.0 and later · up to 1.9.3 inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • IBM Langflow OSS

    • 1.0.0 and later · up to and including 1.9.3affected · semver

Same product

langflow: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-3248Langflow < 1.3.0 Unauthenticated RCE via /api/v1/validate/codeKEV
    99Now
  • CVE-2025-34291Langflow <= 1.6.9 CORS Misconfiguration to Token Hijack & RCEKEV
    95Now
  • CVE-2026-0770Langflow exec_globals Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV
    88Now
  • CVE-2026-9198Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Auto-Login Bypass and Code ValidationKEV
    78This week
  • CVE-2026-33017Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build EndpointKEV
    74This week
  • CVE-2026-55255Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's FlowKEV
    63This week

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-8121372 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery due to missing egress validation on server-side URL fetches
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-105640 days apartSSRF Vulnerability in Langflow OSS Legacy Components Bypasses Protection
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-1930466 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing or bypassable URL validation in multiple components
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-1930566 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing or bypassable URL validation in multiple components
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8126572 days apartLangflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery due to missing egress validation on server-side URL fetches
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2026-908136 days apartLangflow OSS is affected by server-side request forgery in provider validation and API request functionality
    28Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

  • CVE-2026-105618 days apartUnauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow OSS PythonREPLComponent via Builtins Injection
    40Plan
  • CVE-2026-76648 days apartUnauthenticated Flow Execution via Webhook Endpoint in Langflow OSS
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-105600 days apartUnauthenticated Access to Private Flow Build Events and Cancellation in Langflow OSS
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-778719 days apartUnauthenticated Session History Access via Public Flow Execution
    32Monitor

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records