Cross-Tenant API Key Reuse and Billing Fraud in Langflow Voice Mode Subsystem
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 voice mode contains improper shared-state handling that allows reuse of API clients across tenant boundaries. An authenticated attacker can manipulate cache state to cause requests from other users to be processed using incorrect upstream API credentials, leading to cross-tenant billing and accountability misattribution.
- Published
- Jun 30, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 26th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
38
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 38 / 40 · 9.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · ibm
- 9.6
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| langflow | langflow | cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- langflow langflow1.0.0 and later · up to 1.10.0 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IBM Langflow OSS
- 1.0.0 and later · up to and including 1.10.0affected · semver
Same product
langflow: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-3248Langflow < 1.3.0 Unauthenticated RCE via /api/v1/validate/codeKEV99Now
- CVE-2025-34291Langflow <= 1.6.9 CORS Misconfiguration to Token Hijack & RCEKEV95Now
- CVE-2026-0770Langflow exec_globals Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityKEV88Now
- CVE-2026-9198Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Auto-Login Bypass and Code ValidationKEV78This week
- CVE-2026-33017Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build EndpointKEV74This week
- CVE-2026-55255Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's FlowKEV63This week
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-552557 days apartLangflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's FlowKEV63This week
- CVE-2026-337607 days apartLangflow: IDOR/BOLA in Monitor API — Missing Ownership Enforcement on 7 Endpoints35Monitor
- CVE-2026-3404695 days apartLangflow: Authenticated Users Can Read, Modify, and Delete Any Flow via Missing Ownership Check34Monitor
- CVE-2026-1344517 days apartLangflow is affected by remote code execution, denial of service, path traversal, and exposed credentials due to multiple unauthenticated and insufficiently aut32Monitor
- CVE-2026-778719 days apartUnauthenticated Session History Access via Public Flow Execution32Monitor
- CVE-2026-1890459 days apartLangflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({ id: req.params.id, ownerId: req.user.id,});if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.