CVE-2026-0915: getnetbyaddr and getnetbyaddr_r leak stack contents to DNS resovler
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.61% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: azl3 glibc 2.38-18 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.38-18; cbl2 glibc 2.35-9 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.35-9.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glibc 2.38-18 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.38-18; cbl2 glibc 2.35-9 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.35-9 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Calling getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r with a configured nsswitch.conf that specifies the library's DNS backend for networks and queries for a zero-valued network in the GNU C Library version 2.0 to version 2.42 can leak stack contents to the configured DNS resolver.
- BDU:2026-02104
- ALSA-2026:1334
- ALSA-2026:2786
- ALSA-2026:4772
- openSUSE-SU-2026:10662-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:20133-1
- RHSA-2026:1334
- RHSA-2026:2786
- RHSA-2026:4772
- RHSA-2026:7316
- RLSA-2026:1334
- RLSA-2026:2786
- RLSA-2026:4772
- SUSE-SU-2026:0371-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:0680-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:0896-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:20178-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:20198-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:20527-1
- SUSE-SU-2026:20536-1
- Published
- Jan 15, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-908
Report tools
Action score
30
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnu | glibc | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (glibc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
The GNU C Library glibc
- 2.0 and later · up to and including 2.42affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gnu glibc2.0 and later · up to 2.42 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | glibc-doc | before 2.39-58.el10_1.7.alma.1 | 2.39-58.el10_1.7.alma.1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-aa | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-af | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-agr | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-ak | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-am | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-an | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-anp | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-ar | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-as | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-ast | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-ayc | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-az | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-be | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bem | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-ber | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bg | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bhb | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bho | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bi | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bn | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-bo | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-br | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glibc-langpack-brx | before 2.28-251.el8_10.31 | 2.28-251.el8_10.31 |
+96
Same product
gnu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-4911Glibc: buffer overflow in ld.so leading to privilege escalationKEV80Now
- CVE-2015-0235Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows…68This week
- CVE-2015-7547Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc…60This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-5745Jun 5, 2025 · The strncmp implementation optimized for the Power10 processor in the GNU C Library version 2.40 and later writes to vector registers v20…22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-0861Jan 14, 2026 · Integer overflow in memalign leads to heap corruption33Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-15281Jan 20, 2026 · wordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 glibc 2.38-18 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.38-18 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glibc 2.35-9 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.35-9 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:glibc | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-all-langpacks | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-benchtests | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-common | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-devel | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-doc | 2.39-58.el10_1.7.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-gconv-extra | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-headers | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-aa | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-af | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-agr | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glibc-langpack-ak | 2.34-231.el9_7.10 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:glibc | 2.36-9+deb12u14 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc | 2.38-150600.14.40.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-aarch64-src | 2.40-160000.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-ppc64le-src | 2.40-160000.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-riscv64-src | 2.40-160000.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glibc-cross-s390x-src | 2.40-160000.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-benchtests-debuginfo | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-common-debuginfo | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debuginfo | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-debugsource | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-devel | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-doc | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-gconv-extra-debuginfo | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-locale-source | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-utils | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glibc-utils-debuginfo | 0:2.39-58.el10_1.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-02-18 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+33 d
- TodayNov 13, 2026+301 d
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-152815 days apartwordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory30Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized ResourceCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.