Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2015-7547· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response that triggers a call to the getaddrinfo function with the AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6 address family, related to performing "dual A/AAAA DNS queries" and the libnss_dns.so.2 NSS module.

HighCVSS 8.1 · v3.0—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Feb 18, 2016
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
91.0% · 100th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

59

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
27 / 30 · 91.0%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
gnuglibc
debiandebian linux
canonicalubuntu linux
hphelion openstack
hpserver migration pack
sophosunified threat management software
suselinux enterprise debuginfo
opensuseopensuse
suselinux enterprise desktop
suselinux enterprise server
suselinux enterprise software development kit
susesuse linux enterprise server

and 18 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux12.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux15.10
  • debian debian linux8.0
  • f5 big-ip access policy manager12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip analytics12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip application acceleration manager12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip application security manager12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip domain name system12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip link controller12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip local traffic manager12.0.0
  • f5 big-ip policy enforcement manager12.0.0
  • gnu glibc2.10
  • gnu glibc2.10.1
  • gnu glibc2.11
  • gnu glibc2.11.1
  • gnu glibc2.11.2
  • gnu glibc2.11.3
  • gnu glibc2.12

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12glibcbefore 2.21-82.21-8
Debian:6.0eglibcbefore 2.11.3-4+deb6u112.11.3-4+deb6u11
Debian:7eglibcbefore 2.13-38+deb7u102.13-38+deb7u10
Debian:8glibcbefore 2.19-18+deb8u32.19-18+deb8u3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibcbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-commonbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-debuginfobefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-debuginfo-commonbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-develbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-headersbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-staticbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientglibc-utilsbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientnscdbefore 0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.70:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorrhev-hypervisor6before 0:6.7-20160104.2.el6ev0:6.7-20160104.2.el6ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorrhev-hypervisor7before 0:7.2-20160105.2.el6ev0:7.2-20160105.2.el6ev
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibcbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-commonbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-debuginfobefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-debuginfo-commonbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-develbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-headersbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-staticbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientglibc-utilsbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientnscdbefore 0:2.17-106.el7_2.40:2.17-106.el7_2.4

+60

Same product

gnu: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2023-4911Glibc: buffer overflow in ld.so leading to privilege escalationKEV
    85Now
  • CVE-2015-0235Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-depen
    68This week
  • CVE-2024-2961The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converti
    55Plan
  • CVE-2018-11236stdlib/canonicalize.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.27 and earlier, when processing very long pathname arguments to the realpa
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-8779Stack-based buffer overflow in the catopen function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers
    41Plan
  • CVE-2015-8778Integer overflow in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (appl
    41Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:eglibc2.11.3-4+deb6u11 · Debian:6.0Package registry (OSV)
debian:glibc2.21-8 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-common0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-debuginfo0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-debuginfo-common0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-devel0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-headers0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-static0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glibc-utils0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:nscd0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:rhev-hypervisor60:6.7-20160104.2.el6ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:rhev-hypervisor70:7.2-20160105.2.el6ev · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
suse:certification-sles-eal412.0-0.16.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:glibc2.11.3-17.45.66.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP2-LTSSPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Exploit-DB entry ×2
  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×11

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Exploit-DB entrydos2016-02-16
Exploit-DB entryremote2016-09-06
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:5432016-02-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:52016-02-17
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:12016-02-17
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02016-02-18
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02016-02-21
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:82016-03-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:102016-04-05
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02016-11-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02019-06-04
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02019-10-24

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. First PoC-9 d
  2. Published
  3. TodaySep 30, 2026+3877 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records