CVE-2025-8312· NVD / CVE Program· CNA DEVOLUTIONS

Deadlock in PAM automatic check-in feature in Devolutions Server allows a password to remain valid beyond the end of its intended check-out

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.32% (FIRST EPSS).
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Deadlock in PAM automatic check-in feature in Devolutions Server allows a password to remain valid beyond the end of its intended check-out period due to a deadlock occurring in the scheduling service.This issue affects the following version(s) : * Devolutions Server 2025.2.2.0 through 2025.2.5.0 * Devolutions Server 2025.1.12.0 and earlier

HighCVSS 7.1 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

Published: Jul 30, 2025
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 0.3% · 23th percentile
CWE: CWE-833

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
devolutions	devolutions server	cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:devolutions_server

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

devolutions devolutions serverbefore 2025.2.7.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (DEVOLUTIONS). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

Devolutions Server
- 2025.2.2.0 and later · up to and including 2025.2.5.0affected
- up to and including 2025.1.13.0affected

Same product

devolutions: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2026-3224Authentication bypass in the Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) authentication mode in Devolutions Server 2025.3.15.0 and earlier allows an unaut
39Monitor
CVE-2026-3204Improper input validation in the error message page in Devolutions Server 2025.3.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to spoof the displa
39Monitor
CVE-2026-3130Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Controls in Devolutions Server 2025.3.15 and earlier allows an authenticated attacker with the delete per
39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2025-6523Jul 22, 2025 · Use of weak credentials in emergency authentication component in Devolutions Server allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authenticat
38Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2025-6741Jul 22, 2025 · Improper access control in secure message component in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user to steal unauthorized entries via the
28Monitor
Later →CVE-2025-8353Jul 30, 2025 · UI synchronization issue in the Just-in-Time (JIT) access request approval interface in Devolutions Server 2025.2.4.0 and earlier allows a r
23Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).