Improper access control in secure message component in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user to steal unauthorized entries via the
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper access control in secure message component in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user to steal unauthorized entries via the secure message entry attachment feature This issue affects the following versions : * Devolutions Server 2025.2.2.0 through 2025.2.4.0 * Devolutions Server 2025.1.11.0 and earlier
- Published
- Jul 22, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 33th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-284
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · DEVOLUTIONS
- 7.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| devolutions | devolutions server | cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:devolutions_server |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- devolutions devolutions serverup to 2025.1.11.0 inclusive
- devolutions devolutions server2025.2.2.0 and later · before 2025.2.5.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (DEVOLUTIONS). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Devolutions Server
- up to and including 2025.1.11.0affected
- 2025.2.2.0 and later · up to and including 2025.2.4.0affected
Same product
devolutions: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-3224Authentication bypass in the Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) authentication mode in Devolutions Server 2025.3.15.0 and earlier allows an unaut39Monitor
- CVE-2026-3204Improper
input validation in the error message page in Devolutions Server 2025.3.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to spoof the displa39Monitor
- CVE-2026-3130Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Controls in Devolutions Server 2025.3.15 and earlier allows an authenticated attacker with the delete per39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-5382Jun 5, 2025 · Improper access control in users MFA feature in Devolutions Server 2025.1.7.0 and earlier allows a user with user management permission to r27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-6523Jul 22, 2025 · Use of weak credentials in emergency authentication component in Devolutions Server allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authenticat38Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-8312Jul 30, 2025 · Deadlock in PAM automatic check-in feature in Devolutions Server allows a password to remain valid beyond the end of its intended check-out 28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-443353 days apartImproper access control in user group management in Devolutions Server 2025.1.7.0 and earlier allows a non-administrative user with both "Us34Monitor
- CVE-2025-2280131 days apartImproper access control in web extension restriction feature in Devolutions Server 2024.3.4.0
and earlier allows an authenticated user to 32Monitor
- CVE-2025-538247 days apartImproper access control in users MFA feature in Devolutions Server 2025.1.7.0 and earlier allows a user with user management permission to r27Monitor
- CVE-2025-12808107 days apartImproper access control in Devolutions allows a View-only user to retrieve sensitive third-level nested fields, such as password lists custo26Monitor
- CVE-2025-2278131 days apartImproper access control in temporary access requests and checkout requests endpoints in Devolutions Server 2024.3.13 and earlier allows an a26Monitor
- CVE-2026-9590315 days apartImproper access control in the permission validation component in Devolutions Server 2026.1.19 and earlier allows an authenticated user with21Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-284 · Improper Access ControlCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Embedding Scripts within ScriptsCAPEC-19likelihood: High · High
- Malicious Logic InsertionCAPEC-441likelihood: Medium · High
- Modification of Windows Service ConfigurationCAPEC-478likelihood: Low · High
- Malicious Root CertificateCAPEC-479likelihood: Low · Low
- Intent SpoofCAPEC-502
- WebView ExposureCAPEC-503
- Data Injected During ConfigurationCAPEC-536likelihood: Low · High
- Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant EnvironmentCAPEC-546likelihood: Low · Medium
ATT&CK techniques
- RootkitT1014
- Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded PayloadsT1027.009
- Boot or Logon Initialization ScriptsT1037
- Taint shared contentT1080
- Server Software Component: Terminal Services DLLT1505.005
- Pre-OS Boot:BootkitT1542.003
- Create or Modify System ProcessT1543
- Create or Modify System Process: Launch AgentT1543.001
- Create or Modify System Process:Windows ServiceT1543.003
- Create or Modify System Process: Launch DaemonT1543.004
- Event Triggered Execution:Change Default File AssociationT1546.001
- Event Triggered Execution:.bash_profile and .bashrcT1546.004
- Event Triggered Execution: Accessibility FeaturesT1546.008
- Event Triggered Execution: Installer PackagesT1546.016
- Boot or Logon Autostart ExecutionT1547
- Boot or Logon Autostart Execution:Kernel Modules and ExtensionsT1547.006
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.