CVE-2025-7545: GNU Binutils objcopy.c copy_section heap-based overflow
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 7/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 binutils 2.41-7 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.41-7; cbl2 binutils 2.37-15 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.37-16; cbl2 binutils 2.37-16 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.37-16.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 4.8, NVD 1.9.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 binutils 2.41-7 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.41-7; cbl2 binutils 2.37-15 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.37-16; cbl2 binutils 2.37-16 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.37-16 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Affected by this vulnerability is the function copy_section of the file binutils/objcopy.c. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is named 08c3cbe5926e4d355b5cb70bbec2b1eeb40c2944. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
- Published
- Jul 13, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 23th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
7
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 7 / 40 · 1.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 4.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnu | binutils | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:binutils |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gnu binutils2.45
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GNU Binutils
- 2.45affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | binutils | from 0 | — |
| Debian:14 | binutils | before 2.45-3 | 2.45-3 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | mingw32-binutils | before 2.45.1-2.1 | 2.45.1-2.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | mingw64-binutils | before 2.45.1-2.1 | 2.45.1-2.1 |
Same product
gnu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-12699finish_stab in stabs.c in GNU Binutils 2.30 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unsp40Plan
- CVE-2017-7614elflink.c in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.28, has a "member access within null po40Plan
- CVE-2014-9939ihex.c in GNU Binutils before 2.26 contains a stack buffer overflow when printing bad bytes in Intel Hex objects.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-5244May 27, 2025 · GNU Binutils ld elflink.c elf_gc_sweep memory corruption19Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-5245May 27, 2025 · GNU Binutils objdump debug.c debug_type_samep memory corruption19Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-7546Jul 13, 2025 · GNU Binutils elf.c bfd_elf_set_group_contents out-of-bounds write7Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 binutils 2.41-7 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.41-7 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 binutils 2.37-15 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.37-16 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 binutils 2.37-16 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.37-16 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:binutils | 2.45-3 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:mingw32-binutils | 2.45.1-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:mingw64-binutils | 2.45.1-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-01-20 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+190 d
- TodayOct 28, 2026+471 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- arthurx (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-1178152 days apartGNU Binutils ld libbfd.c bfd_putl64 memory corruption25Monitor
- CVE-2025-0840165 days apartGNU Binutils objdump.c disassemble_bytes stack-based overflow25Monitor
- CVE-2025-524447 days apartGNU Binutils ld elflink.c elf_gc_sweep memory corruption19Monitor
- CVE-2025-524547 days apartGNU Binutils objdump debug.c debug_type_samep memory corruption19Monitor
- CVE-2025-1176152 days apartGNU Binutils ld elflink.c _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec heap-based overflow9Monitor
- CVE-2025-1179152 days apartGNU Binutils ld libbfd.c bfd_putl64 memory corruption9Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
- sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049#c1
- sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=08c3cbe5926e4d355b5cb70bbec2b1eeb40c2944
- vuldb.com/?ctiid.316243
- vuldb.com/?id.316243
- vuldb.com/?submit.614355
- www.gnu.org/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.