CVE-2025-68298: Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 2fa09fe98ca3b114d66285f65f7e108fea131815, 6.12.61, 6.14.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 2fa09fe98ca3b114d66285f65f7e108fea131815, 6.12.61, 6.14 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref In btusb_mtk_setup(), we set `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` to: usb_ifnum_to_if(data->udev, MTK_ISO_IFNUM) That function can return NULL in some cases. Even when it returns NULL, though, we still go on to call btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf(). As of commit e9087e828827 ("Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Add locks for usb_driver_claim_interface()"), calling btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() when `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` is NULL will cause a crash because we'll end up passing a bad pointer to device_lock(). Prior to that commit we'd pass the NULL pointer directly to usb_driver_claim_interface() which would detect it and return an error, which was handled. Resolve the crash in btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() by adding a NULL check at the start of the function. This makes the code handle a NULL `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` the same way it did before the problematic commit (just with a slight change to the error message printed).
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 14, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 8th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 4194766ec8756f4f654d595ae49962acbac49490, 6.14affected
- 930e1790b99e5839e1af69d2f7fd808f1fba2df9 and later · before 2fa09fe98ca3b114d66285f65f7e108fea131815affected · git
- e9087e828827e5a5c85e124ce77503f2b81c3491 and later · before c3b990e0b23068da65f0004cd38ee31f43f36460affected · git
- e9087e828827e5a5c85e124ce77503f2b81c3491 and later · before c884a0b27b4586e607431d86a1aa0bb4fb39169caffected · git
- 6.12.13 and later · before 6.12.61affected · semver
- 6.13.2 and later · before 6.14affected · semver
- before 6.14not affected · semver
- 6.12.61 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
- 6.17.11 and later · up to and including 6.17.*not affected · semver
- 6.18 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.63-1 | 6.12.63-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.17.11-1 | 6.17.11-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-68296Dec 16, 2025 · drm, fbcon, vga_switcheroo: Avoid race condition in fbcon setup0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-68297Dec 16, 2025 · ceph: fix crash in process_v2_sparse_read() for encrypted directories0Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-68299Dec 16, 2025 · afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell's anonymous key0Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 2fa09fe98ca3b114d66285f65f7e108fea131815 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 6.12.61 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 6.14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | c3b990e0b23068da65f0004cd38ee31f43f36460 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | c884a0b27b4586e607431d86a1aa0bb4fb39169c | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.12.63-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.