CVE-2025-68242: NFS: Fix LTP test failures when timestamps are delegated
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 0/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 0e9be902041c6b9f0ed4b72764187eed1067a42f, b2e4cda71ed062c87573b016d2d956a62f4258ed, b623390045a81fc559decb9bfeb79319721d3dfb.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 0e9be902041c6b9f0ed4b72764187eed1067a42f, b2e4cda71ed062c87573b016d2d956a62f4258ed, b623390045a81fc559decb9bfeb79319721d3dfb or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFS: Fix LTP test failures when timestamps are delegated The utimes01 and utime06 tests fail when delegated timestamps are enabled, specifically in subtests that modify the atime and mtime fields using the 'nobody' user ID. The problem can be reproduced as follow: # echo "/media *(rw,no_root_squash,sync)" >> /etc/exports # export -ra # mount -o rw,nfsvers=4.2 127.0.0.1:/media /tmpdir # cd /opt/ltp # ./runltp -d /tmpdir -s utimes01 # ./runltp -d /tmpdir -s utime06 This issue occurs because nfs_setattr does not verify the inode's UID against the caller's fsuid when delegated timestamps are permitted for the inode. This patch adds the UID check and if it does not match then the request is sent to the server for permission checking.
- Published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 14, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 8th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
0
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 0 / 40 · —
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 6.11affected
- e12912d94137ab36ee704a91f465ff15c8b423da and later · before b2e4cda71ed062c87573b016d2d956a62f4258edaffected · git
- e12912d94137ab36ee704a91f465ff15c8b423da and later · before 0e9be902041c6b9f0ed4b72764187eed1067a42faffected · git
- e12912d94137ab36ee704a91f465ff15c8b423da and later · before b623390045a81fc559decb9bfeb79319721d3dfbaffected · git
- before 6.11not affected · semver
- 6.12.59 and later · up to and including 6.12.*not affected · semver
- 6.17.9 and later · up to and including 6.17.*not affected · semver
- 6.18 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.12.63-1 | 6.12.63-1 |
| Debian:14 | linux | before 6.17.9-1 | 6.17.9-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-74705udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation40Plan
- CVE-2026-74612veth: fix skb length accounting after XDP frag adjustment40Plan
- CVE-2026-74475vxlan: use neigh_ha_snapshot() in route_shortcircuit()40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-68240Dec 16, 2025 · nilfs2: avoid having an active sc_timer before freeing sci0Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-68241Dec 16, 2025 · ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-68243Dec 16, 2025 · NFS: Check the TLS certificate fields in nfs_match_client()28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 0e9be902041c6b9f0ed4b72764187eed1067a42f | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | b2e4cda71ed062c87573b016d2d956a62f4258ed | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | b623390045a81fc559decb9bfeb79319721d3dfb | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.12.63-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
No CVSS vector for this record, so attack conditions can't be derived.
Weakness class (CWE)
—
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.