KubeVirt Affected by an Authentication Bypass in Kubernetes Aggregation Layer
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.14% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: azl3 kubevirt 1.5.0-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.5.3-2; cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-31 on CBL Mariner 2.0 0.59.0-33; cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-33 on CBL Mariner 2.0 0.59.0-33.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 kubevirt 1.5.0-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 1.5.3-2; cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-31 on CBL Mariner 2.0 0.59.0-33; cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-33 on CBL Mariner 2.0 0.59.0-33 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
KubeVirt is a virtual machine management add-on for Kubernetes. Versions 1.5.3 and below, and 1.6.0 contained a flawed implementation of the Kubernetes aggregation layer's authentication flow which could enable bypass of RBAC controls. It was discovered that the virt-api component fails to correctly authenticate the client when receiving API requests over mTLS. In particular, it fails to validate the CN (Common Name) field in the received client TLS certificates against the set of allowed values defined in the extension-apiserver-authentication configmap. Failre to validate certain fields in the client TLS certificate may allow an attacker to bypass existing RBAC controls by directly communicating with the aggregated API server, impersonating the Kubernetes API server and its aggregator component. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.3 and 1.6.1.
- Published
- Nov 7, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 3th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-287
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 18 / 40 · 4.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.7
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 4.7
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| kubevirt | kubevirt | cpe:2.3:a:kubevirt:kubevirt |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- kubevirt kubevirtbefore 1.5.3
- kubevirt kubevirt1.6.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
kubevirt kubevirt
- < 1.5.3, >= 1.6.0, < 1.6.1affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 1.6.0-alpha.0 · before 1.6.1 | 1.6.1 |
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 1.6.0-alpha.0 · before 1.6.0-beta.0.0.20250730135146-231dc69723f3 | 1.6.0-beta.0.0.20250730135146-231dc69723f3 |
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 1.6.0-rc.0 · before 1.6.1 | 1.6.1 |
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 1.6.2 · before 1.7.0-rc.0 | 1.7.0-rc.0 |
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 1.7.0-alpha.0 · before 1.7.0-rc.0 | 1.7.0-rc.0 |
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | before 1.5.3 | 1.5.3 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | kubevirt | before 1.7.0-160000.1.1 | 1.7.0-160000.1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP7 | kubevirt | before 1.6.3-150700.3.13.1 | 1.6.3-150700.3.13.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | kubevirt | before 1.7.0-160000.1.1 | 1.7.0-160000.1.1 |
Same product
kubevirt: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-14316A flaw was found in kubevirt 0.29 and earlier.39Monitor
- CVE-2025-64324KubeVirt Vulnerable to Arbitrary Host File Read and Write34Monitor
- CVE-2023-26484On a compromised KubeVirt node, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-1798Sep 15, 2022 · Path Traversal vulnerability in Kubevirt26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-33394May 2, 2024 · An issue in kubevirt kubevirt v1.2.0 and before allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted command to get the token com23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-64433Nov 7, 2025 · KubeVirt Arbitrary Container File Read26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 kubevirt 1.5.0-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 1.5.3-2 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-31 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 0.59.0-33 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 kubevirt 0.59.0-33 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 0.59.0-33 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Go:kubevirt.io/kubevirt | 1.5.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:kubevirt.io/kubevirt | 1.6.0-beta.0.0.20250730135146-231dc69723f3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:kubevirt.io/kubevirt | 1.6.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Go:kubevirt.io/kubevirt | 1.7.0-rc.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:kubevirt | 1.7.0-160000.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:kubevirt | 1.6.3-150700.3.13.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-13208229 days apartKubevirt: virt-handler-rhel9: kubevirt: virt-handler notify server trusts vmi identity from unauthenticated grpc request body26Monitor
- CVE-2025-644340 days apartKubeVirt Improper TLS Certificate Management Handling Allows API Identity Spoofing25Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2025-644330 days apartKubeVirt Arbitrary Container File Read26Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-287 · Improper AuthenticationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Authentication is added route by route instead of being enforced in one place. When a route added later bypasses the shared middleware, the session check never runs for it.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-287 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use("/admin", requireSession, adminRouter);
// Route added later skips the middleware
app.post("/admin-api/config", updateConfig);Fixed
const admin = express.Router();
admin.use(requireSession, requireRole("admin"));
admin.post("/config", updateConfig);
app.use("/admin", admin);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Authentication AbuseCAPEC-114Medium
- Authentication BypassCAPEC-115Medium
- Identity SpoofingCAPEC-151likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Fake the Source of DataCAPEC-194Medium
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive DataCAPEC-57likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Session HijackingCAPEC-593likelihood: High · Very High
- Token ImpersonationCAPEC-633Medium
ATT&CK techniques
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.