Path Traversal vulnerability in Kubevirt
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.37% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: kubevirt.io/kubevirt (Go) 0.55.1; kubevirt (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1; kubevirt (openSUSE:Leap 15.4) 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 8.7, NVD 6.5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to kubevirt.io/kubevirt (Go) 0.55.1; kubevirt (openSUSE:Leap 15.3) 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1; kubevirt (openSUSE:Leap 15.4) 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A path traversal vulnerability in KubeVirt versions up to 0.56 (and 0.55.1) on all platforms allows a user able to configure the kubevirt to read arbitrary files on the host filesystem which are publicly readable or which are readable for UID 107 or GID 107. /proc/self/<> is not accessible.
- Published
- Sep 15, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 30th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · Google
- 8.7
- 2.2 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| kubevirt | kubevirt | cpe:2.3:a:kubevirt:kubevirt |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- kubevirt kubevirt0.20.0 and later · before 0.55.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Google). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Google LLC Kubevirt
- unspecified and later · before 0.55.1affected
- unspecified and later · before 0.56.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | kubevirt.io/kubevirt | from 0.20.0 · before 0.55.1 | 0.55.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | kubevirt | before 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 | 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | kubevirt | before 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2 | 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP3 | kubevirt | before 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 | 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP4 | kubevirt | before 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2 | 0.54.0-150400.3.3.2 |
Same product
kubevirt: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-14316A flaw was found in kubevirt 0.29 and earlier.39Monitor
- CVE-2025-64324KubeVirt Vulnerable to Arbitrary Host File Read and Write34Monitor
- CVE-2023-26484On a compromised KubeVirt node, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-1701May 27, 2021 · A flaw was found in the KubeVirt main virt-handler versions before 0.26.0 regarding the access permissions of virt-handler.26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-33394May 2, 2024 · An issue in kubevirt kubevirt v1.2.0 and before allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted command to get the token com23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-64432Nov 7, 2025 · KubeVirt Affected by an Authentication Bypass in Kubernetes Aggregation Layer18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:kubevirt.io/kubevirt | 0.55.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:kubevirt | 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:kubevirt | 0.49.0-150300.8.13.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Diane Dubois and Roman MohrGoogle
- Oliver Brooks and James KlopchicNCC Group
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →