Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2025-30208: Vite bypasses server.fs.deny when using `?raw??`

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—Proof of concept Fix available

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 52/100)

  • A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
  • Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB, GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 74.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.5% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: vite (npm) 5.4.15, 6.0.12, 6.1.2.
  • Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 5.3, NVD 7.5.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to vite (npm) 5.4.15, 6.0.12, 6.1.2 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Vite, a provider of frontend development tooling, has a vulnerability in versions prior to 6.2.3, 6.1.2, 6.0.12, 5.4.15, and 4.5.10. `@fs` denies access to files outside of Vite serving allow list. Adding `?raw??` or `?import&raw??` to the URL bypasses this limitation and returns the file content if it exists. This bypass exists because trailing separators such as `?` are removed in several places, but are not accounted for in query string regexes. The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser. Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using `--host` or `server.host` config option) are affected. Versions 6.2.3, 6.1.2, 6.0.12, 5.4.15, and 4.5.10 fix the issue.

Published
Mar 24, 2025
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
74.7% · 99th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

52

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
22 / 30 · 74.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
7.5
CNA · GitHub_M
5.3
2.2 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-30208

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits every 10 minutes on paid plans, on the hour on the free plan.

Your free account also gets you

  • CVE alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools, at most 30 a day (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for vitejs records
Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
vitejsvite

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • vitejs vite

    • < 4.5.10, >= 5.0.0, < 5.4.15, >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.12, >= 6.1.0, < 6.1.2, >= 6.2.0, < 6.2.3affected
Affected versions · NVD (5)

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • vitejs vitebefore 4.5.10
  • vitejs vite5.0.0 and later · before 5.4.15
  • vitejs vite6.0.0 and later · before 6.0.12
  • vitejs vite6.1.0 and later · before 6.1.2
  • vitejs vite6.2.0 and later · before 6.2.3

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
npmvitefrom 5.0.0 · before 5.4.155.4.15
npmvitefrom 6.0.0 · before 6.0.126.0.12
npmvitefrom 6.1.0 · before 6.1.26.1.2
npmvitefrom 6.2.0 · before 6.2.36.2.3
npmvitebefore 4.5.104.5.10

Same product

vitejs: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-31125Vite has a `server.fs.deny` bypassed for `inline` and `raw` with `?import` queryKEV
    82Now
  • CVE-2026-39364Vite has a `server.fs.deny` bypass with queries
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-39363Vite Affected by Arbitrary File Read via Vite Dev Server WebSocket
    33Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-45812Sep 17, 2024 · DOM Clobbering gadget found in vite bundled scripts that leads to XSS in Vite
    25Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-24010Jan 20, 2025 · Vite allows any websites to send any requests to the development server and read the response
    26Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-31486Apr 3, 2025 · Vite allows server.fs.deny to be bypassed with .svg or relative paths
    33Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
npm:vite4.5.10Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite5.4.15Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite6.0.12Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite6.1.2Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite6.2.3Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Exploit-DB entry ×1
  • Nuclei detection template ×1
  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×24

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub24 repositories2025-03-26 → 2026-10-18
Exploit-DB entryremote2025-04-03
Nuclei detection templateNuclei template CVE-2025-30208 —

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+1 d
  3. TodayNov 12, 2026+598 d

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-311257 days apartVite has a `server.fs.deny` bypassed for `inline` and `raw` with `?import` queryKEV
    82Now
  • CVE-2025-3148610 days apartVite allows server.fs.deny to be bypassed with .svg or relative paths
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-39363379 days apartVite Affected by Arbitrary File Read via Vite Dev Server WebSocket
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2025-3239517 days apartVite has an `server.fs.deny` bypass with an invalid `request-target`
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2024-31207354 days apartVite's `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns with directories
    23Monitor
  • CVE-2024-45811188 days apartserver.fs.deny bypassed when using ?import&raw in vite
    19Monitor

Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · public bounty program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Root cause

The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-200 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

json
{  "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],  "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }}

Fixed

json
{  "permissions": ["activeTab"],  "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

References

Show all references (4 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records