Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2024-45811: server.fs.deny bypassed when using ?import&raw in vite

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 19/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 65.6% of all records.
  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: vite (npm) 4.5.4, 5.1.8, 5.2.14; velociraptor (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.7.0.4.git142.862ef23-1.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to vite (npm) 4.5.4, 5.1.8, 5.2.14; velociraptor (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.7.0.4.git142.862ef23-1.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Vite a frontend build tooling framework for javascript. In affected versions the contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser. `@fs` denies access to files outside of Vite serving allow list. Adding `?import&raw` to the URL bypasses this limitation and returns the file content if it exists. This issue has been patched in versions 5.4.6, 5.3.6, 5.2.14, 4.5.5, and 3.2.11. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

MediumCVSS 4.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 17, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
1.0% · 65th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

19

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
19 / 40 · 4.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.0%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
4.8
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2024-45811

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for vitejs records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
vitejsvite

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • vitejs vite

    • >= 5.4.0, < 5.4.6, >= 5.3.0, < 5.3.6, >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.14, >= 4.0.0, < 4.5.5, < 3.2.11affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
npmvitefrom 4.0.0 · before 4.5.44.5.4
npmvitefrom 5.0.0 · before 5.1.85.1.8
npmvitefrom 5.2.0 · before 5.2.145.2.14
npmvitefrom 5.3.0 · before 5.3.65.3.6
npmvitefrom 5.4.0 · before 5.4.65.4.6
npmvitebefore 3.2.113.2.11
openSUSE:Tumbleweedvelociraptorbefore 0.7.0.4.git142.862ef23-1.10.7.0.4.git142.862ef23-1.1

Same product

vitejs: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-31125Vite has a `server.fs.deny` bypassed for `inline` and `raw` with `?import` queryKEV
    82Now
  • CVE-2025-30208Vite bypasses server.fs.deny when using `?raw??`
    52Plan
  • CVE-2026-39364Vite has a `server.fs.deny` bypass with queries
    33Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-23331Jan 19, 2024 · Vite dev server option `server.fs.deny` can be bypassed when hosted on case-insensitive filesystem
    30Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-31207Apr 4, 2024 · Vite's `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns with directories
    23Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2024-45812Sep 17, 2024 · DOM Clobbering gadget found in vite bundled scripts that leads to XSS in Vite
    25Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
npm:vite3.2.11Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite4.5.4Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite5.1.8Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite5.2.14Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite5.3.6Package registry (OSV)
npm:vite5.4.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:velociraptor0.7.0.4.git142.862ef23-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-31125195 days apartVite has a `server.fs.deny` bypassed for `inline` and `raw` with `?import` queryKEV
    82Now
  • CVE-2025-30208188 days apartVite bypasses server.fs.deny when using `?raw??`
    52Plan
  • CVE-2025-31486198 days apartVite allows server.fs.deny to be bypassed with .svg or relative paths
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2025-32395205 days apartVite has an `server.fs.deny` bypass with an invalid `request-target`
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2024-31207166 days apartVite's `server.fs.deny` did not deny requests for patterns with directories
    23Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The extension requests broader permissions than its function needs and sends the data it collects out for purposes beyond its stated function.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-200 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

json
{  "permissions": ["tabs", "<all_urls>"],  "background": { "service_worker": "analytics.js" }}

Fixed

json
{  "permissions": ["activeTab"],  "host_permissions": ["https://yildiz.example/*"]}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (1 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records