CVE-2024-7006: Libtiff: null pointer dereference in tif_dirinfo.c
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 74.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 4.6.0-4; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 4.6.0-4; CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 4.6.0-3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 4.6.0-4; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 4.6.0-4; CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 4.6.0-3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A null pointer dereference flaw was found in Libtiff via `tif_dirinfo.c`. This issue may allow an attacker to trigger memory allocation failures through certain means, such as restricting the heap space size or injecting faults, causing a segmentation fault. This can cause an application crash, eventually leading to a denial of service.
- Published
- Aug 12, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.5% · 74th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-476
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| libtiff | libtiff | cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux for arm 64 | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 |
| redhat | enterprise linux for power little endian eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- libtiff libtiff3.5.1 and later · up to 4.6.0 inclusive
- redhat enterprise linux8.0
- redhat enterprise linux9.0
- redhat enterprise linux for arm 649.2
- redhat enterprise linux for power little endian eus9.2
- redhat enterprise linux server aus9.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff libtiff
- 4.4.0, 4.0.9not affected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support
- 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | libtiff | before 4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | libtiff-devel | before 4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | libtiff-tools | before 4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | libtiff | before 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | libtiff-devel | before 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | libtiff-tools | before 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Debian:11 | tiff | before 4.2.0-1+deb11u6 | 4.2.0-1+deb11u6 |
| Debian:12 | tiff | before 4.5.0-6+deb12u2 | 4.5.0-6+deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | tiff | before 4.5.1+git230720-5 | 4.5.1+git230720-5 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | tiff | before 4.6.0-150600.3.3.1 | 4.6.0-150600.3.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | tiff | before 4.0.9-150000.45.47.1 | 4.0.9-150000.45.47.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | tiff | before 4.6.0-5.1 | 4.6.0-5.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | libtiff | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | libtiff-debugsource | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | libtiff-devel | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | libtiff-tools-debuginfo | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crb | libtiff-tools | before 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | libtiff | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | libtiff-debugsource | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | libtiff-devel | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | libtiff-tools-debuginfo | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | libtiff-tools | before 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 | 0:4.4.0-12.el9_4.1 |
+14
Same product
libtiff: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2006-3459Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TIFF library (libtiff) before 3.8.2, as used in Adobe Reader 9.3.0 and other products, allow co46Plan
- CVE-2004-1308Integer overflow in (1) tif_dirread.c and (2) tif_fax3.c for libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a44Plan
- CVE-2018-12900Heap-based buffer overflow in the cpSeparateBufToContigBuf function in tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0beta7, 4.43Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-52355Jan 25, 2024 · Libtiff: tiffrasterscanlinesize64 produce too-big size and could cause oom31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-52356Jan 25, 2024 · Libtiff: segment fault in libtiff in tiffreadrgbatileext() leading to denial of service31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-8176Jul 26, 2025 · LibTIFF tiffmedian.c get_histogram use after free7Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 4.6.0-4 · libtiff | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 4.6.0-4 · libtiff | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 4.6.0-3 · libtiff | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 4.6.0-3 · libtiff | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:libtiff | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:libtiff-devel | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:libtiff-tools | 4.0.9-33.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:tiff | 4.5.0-6+deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:tiff | 4.0.9-150000.45.47.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-debuginfo | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-debugsource | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-devel | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-tools | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-tools-debuginfo | 0:4.4.0-8.el9_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:libtiff | 0:4.0.9-33.el8_10 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:tiff | 4.0.9-150000.45.47.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:tiff | 4.0.9-44.86.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-3316420 days apartA NULL pointer dereference in TIFFClose() is caused by a failure to open an output file (non-existent path or a path that requires permissions like /dev/null) w26Monitor
- CVE-2023-2908409 days apartLibtiff: null pointer dereference in tif_dir.c22Monitor
- CVE-2023-2731453 days apartA NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in Libtiff's LZWDecode() function in the libtiff/tif_lzw.c file.22Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-476 · NULL Pointer DereferenceCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.