CVE-2024-52533: gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 74.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.1-5; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.1-5; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.1-5; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.1-5; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not sufficient for a trailing '\0' character.
- BDU:2024-10796
- ALSA-2025:0936
- ALSA-2025:11140
- ALSA-2025:11327
- DLA-3962-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14487-1
- RHSA-2025:0936
- RHSA-2025:10855
- RHSA-2025:11140
- RHSA-2025:11327
- RHSA-2025:11373
- RHSA-2025:11374
- RHSA-2025:12275
- RHSA-2025:14988
- RHSA-2025:14989
- RHSA-2025:14990
- RHSA-2025:14991
- RLSA-2025:0936
- RLSA-2025:10855
- RLSA-2025:11140
- Published
- Nov 11, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.5% · 74th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
39
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnome | glib | cpe:2.3:a:gnome:glib |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
| netapp | ontap tools | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_tools |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux11.0
- gnome glibbefore 2.82.1
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
- netapp ontap tools10
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2 | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-devel | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-doc | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-fam | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-static | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-tests | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2 | before 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-devel | before 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-doc | before 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-static | before 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-tests | before 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw32-glib2 | before 2.78.6-2.el9 | 2.78.6-2.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw32-glib2-static | before 2.78.6-2.el9 | 2.78.6-2.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw64-glib2 | before 2.78.6-2.el9 | 2.78.6-2.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw64-glib2-static | before 2.78.6-2.el9 | 2.78.6-2.el9 |
| Debian:11 | glib2.0 | before 2.66.8-1+deb11u5 | 2.66.8-1+deb11u5 |
| Debian:12 | glib2.0 | before 2.74.6-2+deb12u5 | 2.74.6-2+deb12u5 |
| Debian:13 | glib2.0 | before 2.82.1-1 | 2.82.1-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | glib2-doc | before 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 | 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | glib2 | before 2.78.6-150600.4.8.1 | 2.78.6-150600.4.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | glib2-doc | before 2.78.6-150600.4.8.1 | 2.78.6-150600.4.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | glib2 | before 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 | 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | glib2 | before 2.82.2-2.1 | 2.82.2-2.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | glib2 | before 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 |
+96
Same product
gnome: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-12450file_copy_fallback in gio/gfile.c in GNOME GLib 2.15.0 through 2.61.1 does not properly restrict file permissions while a copy operation is…40Plan
- CVE-2018-16428In GNOME GLib 2.56.1, g_markup_parse_context_end_parse() in gmarkup.c has a NULL pointer dereference.40Plan
- CVE-2025-14087Glib: glib: buffer underflow in gvariant parser leads to heap corruption39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-32665Sep 14, 2023 · Gvariant deserialisation does not match spec for non-normal data22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-34397May 7, 2024 · An issue was discovered in GNOME GLib before 2.78.5, and 2.79.x and 2.80.x before 2.80.1.20Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-6052Jun 13, 2025 · Glib: integer overflow in g_string_maybe_expand() leading to potential buffer overflow in glib gstring30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.78.1-5 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.78.1-5 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-4 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-4 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:glib2 | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-devel | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-doc | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-fam | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-static | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-tests | 2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw32-glib2 | 2.78.6-2.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw32-glib2-static | 2.78.6-2.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw64-glib2 | 2.78.6-2.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw64-glib2-static | 2.78.6-2.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:glib2.0 | 2.74.6-2+deb12u5 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glib2 | 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glib2-doc | 2.70.5-150400.3.17.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-debuginfo | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-debugsource | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-devel | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-devel-debuginfo | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-tests | 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.6 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw-glib2 | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw32-glib2 | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw32-glib2-debuginfo | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw32-glib2-static | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw64-glib2 | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw64-glib2-debuginfo | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mingw64-glib2-static | 0:2.78.6-2.el9 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
+4
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
- gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/security/-/wikis/home
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/11/12/11
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00020.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241206-0009/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-089022.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-202008.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.