Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2024-34397· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

An issue was discovered in GNOME GLib before 2.78.5, and 2.79.x and 2.80.x before 2.80.1.

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.76% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 54.5% of all records.
  • Physical access to the device is required. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-7.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-7 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

An issue was discovered in GNOME GLib before 2.78.5, and 2.79.x and 2.80.x before 2.80.1. When a GDBus-based client subscribes to signals from a trusted system service such as NetworkManager on a shared computer, other users of the same computer can send spoofed D-Bus signals that the GDBus-based client will wrongly interpret as having been sent by the trusted system service. This could lead to the GDBus-based client behaving incorrectly, with an application-dependent impact.

MediumCVSS 5.2 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 7, 2024
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
EPSS
0.7% · 54th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

20

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.2 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.7%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2024-34397

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
gnomeglib
debiandebian linux
fedoraprojectfedora
netappontap tools

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux10.0
  • fedoraproject fedora39
  • fedoraproject fedora40
  • gnome glibbefore 2.78.5
  • gnome glib2.79.0 and later · before 2.80.1
  • netapp ontap tools10

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8glib2before 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8glib2-develbefore 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8glib2-docbefore 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8glib2-fambefore 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8glib2-staticbefore 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8glib2-testsbefore 2.56.4-166.el8_102.56.4-166.el8_10
AlmaLinux:9glib2before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.12.68.4-14.el9_4.1
AlmaLinux:9glib2-develbefore 2.68.4-14.el9_4.12.68.4-14.el9_4.1
AlmaLinux:9glib2-docbefore 2.68.4-14.el9_4.12.68.4-14.el9_4.1
AlmaLinux:9glib2-staticbefore 2.68.4-14.el9_4.12.68.4-14.el9_4.1
AlmaLinux:9glib2-testsbefore 2.68.4-14.el9_4.12.68.4-14.el9_4.1
AlmaLinux:9mingw32-glib2before 2.78.6-1.el92.78.6-1.el9
AlmaLinux:9mingw32-glib2-staticbefore 2.78.6-1.el92.78.6-1.el9
AlmaLinux:9mingw64-glib2before 2.78.6-1.el92.78.6-1.el9
AlmaLinux:9mingw64-glib2-staticbefore 2.78.6-1.el92.78.6-1.el9
Alpine:v3.19glibfrom 2.79.0 · before 2.78.5-r02.78.5-r0
Alpine:v3.20glibfrom 2.79.0 · before 2.80.1-r02.80.1-r0
Debian:10glib2.0before 2.58.3-2+deb10u62.58.3-2+deb10u6
Debian:11glib2.0before 2.66.8-1+deb11u22.66.8-1+deb11u2
Debian:12glib2.0before 2.74.6-2+deb12u12.74.6-2+deb12u1
Debian:13glib2.0before 2.80.0-102.80.0-10
openSUSE:Leap 15.5glib2-docbefore 2.70.5-150400.3.11.12.70.5-150400.3.11.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.5glib2-docbefore 2.70.5-150400.3.14.12.70.5-150400.3.14.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6glib2-docbefore 2.78.6-150600.4.3.12.78.6-150600.4.3.1

+86

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2019-12450file_copy_fallback in gio/gfile.c in GNOME GLib 2.15.0 through 2.61.1 does not properly restrict file permissions while a copy operation is
    40Plan
  • CVE-2018-16428In GNOME GLib 2.56.1, g_markup_parse_context_end_parse() in gmarkup.c has a NULL pointer dereference.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2025-14087Glib: glib: buffer underflow in gvariant parser leads to heap corruption
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2023-32643Sep 14, 2023 · A flaw was found in GLib.
    31Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2023-32665Sep 14, 2023 · Gvariant deserialisation does not match spec for non-normal data
    22Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2024-52533Nov 11, 2024 · gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not suf
    39Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.02.78.6-1 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.02.78.6-1 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.02.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 glib 2.71.0-6 on CBL Mariner 2.02.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 glib 2.71.0-7 on CBL Mariner 2.02.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 glib 2.71.0-7 on CBL-Mariner 2.02.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
almalinux:glib22.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:glib2-devel2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:glib2-doc2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:glib2-fam2.56.4-166.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:glib2-static2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:glib2-tests2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:mingw32-glib22.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:mingw32-glib2-static2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:mingw64-glib22.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:mingw64-glib2-static2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
alpine:glib2.78.5-r0 · Alpine:v3.19Package registry (OSV)
debian:glib2.02.74.6-2+deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:glib22.70.5-150400.3.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:glib2-branding-SLE15-150600.35.2.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:glib2-doc2.70.5-150400.3.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5Package registry (OSV)
red hat:glib20:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-debuginfo0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-debugsource0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-devel0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-devel-debuginfo0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-doc0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-static0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-tests0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:glib2-tests-debuginfo0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)

+6

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Physical access to the device is required.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Physical
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
Low

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

nvd-secondary

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records