An issue was discovered in GNOME GLib before 2.78.5, and 2.79.x and 2.80.x before 2.80.1.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.76% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 54.5% of all records.
- Physical access to the device is required. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.78.6-1; cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 2.71.0-7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An issue was discovered in GNOME GLib before 2.78.5, and 2.79.x and 2.80.x before 2.80.1. When a GDBus-based client subscribes to signals from a trusted system service such as NetworkManager on a shared computer, other users of the same computer can send spoofed D-Bus signals that the GDBus-based client will wrongly interpret as having been sent by the trusted system service. This could lead to the GDBus-based client behaving incorrectly, with an application-dependent impact.
- BDU:2024-04422
- ALSA-2024:6464
- ALSA-2024:9442
- ALSA-2025:11327
- DLA-3814-1
- DSA-5682-1
- RHSA-2024:6464
- RHSA-2024:9442
- RHSA-2025:10780
- RHSA-2025:11327
- RHSA-2025:14988
- RHSA-2025:14989
- RHSA-2025:14990
- RHSA-2025:14991
- RLSA-2024:6464
- RLSA-2025:11327
- SUSE-SU-2024:1830-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:1830-2
- SUSE-SU-2024:1833-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:1950-1
- Published
- May 7, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 54th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-290
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnome | glib | cpe:2.3:a:gnome:glib |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| netapp | ontap tools | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_tools |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux10.0
- fedoraproject fedora39
- fedoraproject fedora40
- gnome glibbefore 2.78.5
- gnome glib2.79.0 and later · before 2.80.1
- netapp ontap tools10
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2 | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-devel | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-doc | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-fam | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-static | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | glib2-tests | before 2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2 | before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-devel | before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-doc | before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-static | before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | glib2-tests | before 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw32-glib2 | before 2.78.6-1.el9 | 2.78.6-1.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw32-glib2-static | before 2.78.6-1.el9 | 2.78.6-1.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw64-glib2 | before 2.78.6-1.el9 | 2.78.6-1.el9 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | mingw64-glib2-static | before 2.78.6-1.el9 | 2.78.6-1.el9 |
| Alpine:v3.19 | glib | from 2.79.0 · before 2.78.5-r0 | 2.78.5-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.20 | glib | from 2.79.0 · before 2.80.1-r0 | 2.80.1-r0 |
| Debian:10 | glib2.0 | before 2.58.3-2+deb10u6 | 2.58.3-2+deb10u6 |
| Debian:11 | glib2.0 | before 2.66.8-1+deb11u2 | 2.66.8-1+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | glib2.0 | before 2.74.6-2+deb12u1 | 2.74.6-2+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | glib2.0 | before 2.80.0-10 | 2.80.0-10 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | glib2-doc | before 2.70.5-150400.3.11.1 | 2.70.5-150400.3.11.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | glib2-doc | before 2.70.5-150400.3.14.1 | 2.70.5-150400.3.14.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | glib2-doc | before 2.78.6-150600.4.3.1 | 2.78.6-150600.4.3.1 |
+86
Same product
gnome: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-12450file_copy_fallback in gio/gfile.c in GNOME GLib 2.15.0 through 2.61.1 does not properly restrict file permissions while a copy operation is 40Plan
- CVE-2018-16428In GNOME GLib 2.56.1, g_markup_parse_context_end_parse() in gmarkup.c has a NULL pointer dereference.40Plan
- CVE-2025-14087Glib: glib: buffer underflow in gvariant parser leads to heap corruption39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-32643Sep 14, 2023 · A flaw was found in GLib.31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-32665Sep 14, 2023 · Gvariant deserialisation does not match spec for non-normal data22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-52533Nov 11, 2024 · gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not suf39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 glib 2.78.1-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.78.6-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 glib 2.78.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.78.6-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-6 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-7 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 glib 2.71.0-7 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 | 2.71.0-7 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:glib2 | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-devel | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-doc | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-fam | 2.56.4-166.el8_10 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-static | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:glib2-tests | 2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw32-glib2 | 2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw32-glib2-static | 2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw64-glib2 | 2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:mingw64-glib2-static | 2.78.6-1.el9 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:glib | 2.78.5-r0 · Alpine:v3.19 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:glib2.0 | 2.74.6-2+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glib2 | 2.70.5-150400.3.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glib2-branding-SLE | 15-150600.35.2.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:glib2-doc | 2.70.5-150400.3.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2 | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-debuginfo | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-debugsource | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-devel | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-devel-debuginfo | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-doc | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-static | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-tests | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:glib2-tests-debuginfo | 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
+6
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Physical access to the device is required.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Physical
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-290 · Authentication Bypass by SpoofingCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Exploitation of Trusted IdentifiersCAPEC-21likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-22likelihood: High · High
- Creating a Rogue Certification Authority CertificateCAPEC-459likelihood: Medium · Very High
- Web Services API Signature Forgery Leveraging Hash Function Extension WeaknessCAPEC-461High
- Signature SpoofCAPEC-473
- Signature Spoofing by MisrepresentationCAPEC-476likelihood: Low · High
- Session Credential Falsification through PredictionCAPEC-59likelihood: High · High
- Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)CAPEC-60likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Access Token ManipulationT1134
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Steal Application Access TokenT1528
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Adversary-in-the-MiddleT1557
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (12 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IRSFYAE5X23TNRWX7ZWEJOMISLCDSYNS/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LCDY3KA7G7D3DRXYTT46K6LFHS2KHWBH/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LL6HSJDXCXMLEIJBYV6CPOR4K2NTCTXW/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UNFJHISR4O6VFOHBFWH5I5WWMG37H63A/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240531-0008/
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/07/5
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IRSFYAE5X23TNRWX7ZWEJOMISLCDSYNS/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LCDY3KA7G7D3DRXYTT46K6LFHS2KHWBH/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LL6HSJDXCXMLEIJBYV6CPOR4K2NTCTXW/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UNFJHISR4O6VFOHBFWH5I5WWMG37H63A/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.