CVE-2024-4741: Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.14, 3.1.6, 3.2.2; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.14, 3.1.6, 3.2.2; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications. The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use. The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use. The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use. While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
- BDU:2024-05176
- ALSA-2024:9333
- ALSA-2026:26275
- DLA-3942-1
- DLA-3942-2
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14219-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14220-1
- RHSA-2024:9333
- RHSA-2026:26275
- RLSA-2024:9333
- RLSA-2026:26275
- SUSE-SU-2024:2020-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2035-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2036-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2051-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2051-2
- SUSE-SU-2024:2059-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2066-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2088-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:2089-1
- Published
- Nov 13, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.9% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-416
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
OpenSSL OpenSSL
- 3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.1affected · semver
- 3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.2affected · semver
- 3.1.0 and later · before 3.1.6affected · semver
- 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.14affected · semver
- 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1yaffected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl | before 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-devel | before 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-libs | before 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | openssl-perl | before 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-devel | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-libs | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | openssl-perl | before 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 |
| Alpine:v3.17 | openssl | before 3.0.14-r0 | 3.0.14-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.18 | openssl | before 3.1.6-r0 | 3.1.6-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.20 | openssl | before 3.3.0-r3 | 3.3.0-r3 |
| Debian:11 | openssl | before 1.1.1n-0+deb11u6 | 1.1.1n-0+deb11u6 |
| Debian:11 | openssl | before 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2 | 1.1.1w-0+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 3.0.14-1~deb12u1 | 3.0.14-1~deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | openssl | before 3.2.2-1 | 3.2.2-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1l-150500.17.31.1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.31.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | openssl-3 | before 3.0.8-150500.5.36.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.36.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1w-150600.5.3.1 | 1.1.1w-150600.5.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-150600.5.7.1 | 3.1.4-150600.5.7.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3 | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1l-150400.7.69.1 | 1.1.1l-150400.7.69.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3 | openssl-3 | before 3.0.8-150400.4.57.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.57.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-1_1 | before 1.1.1w-11.1 | 1.1.1w-11.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | openssl-3 | before 3.1.4-11.1 | 3.1.4-11.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | openssl | before 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 | 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_6 |
+31
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-6119Sep 3, 2024 · Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks50Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-9143Oct 16, 2024 · Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access19Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-13176Jan 20, 2025 · Timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation16Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.0.14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.1.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.2.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| OpenSSL OpenSSL | 3.3.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-5 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 1.0.1-6 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-6 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 1.0.1-6 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-31 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 1.1.1k-31 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-36 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 1.1.1k-31 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:openssl | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-devel | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-libs | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:openssl-perl | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:openssl | 3.0.14-r0 · Alpine:v3.17 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:openssl | 3.0.14-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-1_1 | 1.1.1l-150500.17.31.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:openssl-3 | 3.0.8-150500.5.36.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debuginfo | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-debugsource | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-devel | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openssl-perl | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:openssl | 1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:openssl-fips-provider | 0:3.0.7-6.el9_5 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:jitterentropy | 3.4.1-3.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:libpulp | 0.3.5-1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl-1_1 | 1.1.1d-150200.11.91.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
+3
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Matt Caswellremediation developer
- William Ahern (Akamai)finder
- Watson Ladd (Akamai)remediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-28387510 days apartPotential Use-after-free in DANE Client Code32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-416 · Use After FreeCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
After a memory region is freed, another reference pointing to it is still used. By then, the same region may have been allocated for different data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-416 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
free(dev->buf);
/* ... another thread is still running ... */
process(dev->buf);Fixed
lock(&dev->lock);
free(dev->buf);
dev->buf = NULL;
unlock(&dev->lock);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b3f0eb0a295f58f16ba43ba99dad70d4ee5c437d
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c88c3de51020c37e8706bf7a682a162593053aac
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e5093133c35ca82874ad83697af76f4b0f7e3bd8
- github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/f7a045f3143fc6da2ee66bf52d8df04829590dd4
- www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240528.txt
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0004/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.