Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

CVE-2024-4741: Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.9% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.14, 3.1.6, 3.2.2; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.14, 3.1.6, 3.2.2; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6; azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.0 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications. The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use. The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use. The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use. While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 13, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
2.9% · 86th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.9%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2024-4741

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • 3.3.0 and later · before 3.3.1affected · semver
    • 3.2.0 and later · before 3.2.2affected · semver
    • 3.1.0 and later · before 3.1.6affected · semver
    • 3.0.0 and later · before 3.0.14affected · semver
    • 1.1.1 and later · before 1.1.1yaffected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8opensslbefore 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_61:1.1.1k-16.el8_6
AlmaLinux:8openssl-develbefore 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_61:1.1.1k-16.el8_6
AlmaLinux:8openssl-libsbefore 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_61:1.1.1k-16.el8_6
AlmaLinux:8openssl-perlbefore 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_61:1.1.1k-16.el8_6
AlmaLinux:9opensslbefore 1:3.2.2-6.el9_51:3.2.2-6.el9_5
AlmaLinux:9openssl-develbefore 1:3.2.2-6.el9_51:3.2.2-6.el9_5
AlmaLinux:9openssl-libsbefore 1:3.2.2-6.el9_51:3.2.2-6.el9_5
AlmaLinux:9openssl-perlbefore 1:3.2.2-6.el9_51:3.2.2-6.el9_5
Alpine:v3.17opensslbefore 3.0.14-r03.0.14-r0
Alpine:v3.18opensslbefore 3.1.6-r03.1.6-r0
Alpine:v3.20opensslbefore 3.3.0-r33.3.0-r3
Debian:11opensslbefore 1.1.1n-0+deb11u61.1.1n-0+deb11u6
Debian:11opensslbefore 1.1.1w-0+deb11u21.1.1w-0+deb11u2
Debian:12opensslbefore 3.0.14-1~deb12u13.0.14-1~deb12u1
Debian:13opensslbefore 3.2.2-13.2.2-1
openSUSE:Leap 15.5openssl-1_1before 1.1.1l-150500.17.31.11.1.1l-150500.17.31.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.5openssl-3before 3.0.8-150500.5.36.13.0.8-150500.5.36.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6openssl-1_1before 1.1.1w-150600.5.3.11.1.1w-150600.5.3.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6openssl-3before 3.1.4-150600.5.7.13.1.4-150600.5.7.1
openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3openssl-1_1before 1.1.1l-150400.7.69.11.1.1l-150400.7.69.1
openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3openssl-3before 3.0.8-150400.4.57.13.0.8-150400.4.57.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-1_1before 1.1.1w-11.11.1.1w-11.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-3before 3.1.4-11.13.1.4-11.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopensslbefore 1:1.1.1k-16.el8_61:1.1.1k-16.el8_6

+31

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-6119Sep 3, 2024 · Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks
    50Plan
  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-9143Oct 16, 2024 · Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access
    19Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2024-13176Jan 20, 2025 · Timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation
    16Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.0.14Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.1.6Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.2.2Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.3.1Vendor (CNA)
azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-6 on Azure Linux 3.020240524git3e722403cd16-6 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8 on Azure Linux 3.020240524git3e722403cd16-6 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-5 on CBL Mariner 2.01.0.1-6 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-6 on CBL Mariner 2.01.0.1-6 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-31 on CBL Mariner 2.01.1.1k-31 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-36 on CBL Mariner 2.01.1.1k-31 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
almalinux:openssl1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-devel1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-libs1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-perl1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
alpine:openssl3.0.14-r0 · Alpine:v3.17Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl3.0.14-1~deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-1_11.1.1l-150500.17.31.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-33.0.8-150500.5.36.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debugsource1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:3.2.2-6.el9_5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:openssl1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:openssl-fips-provider0:3.0.7-6.el9_5 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
suse:jitterentropy3.4.1-3.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0Package registry (OSV)
suse:libpulp0.3.5-1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-1_11.1.1d-150200.11.91.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSSPackage registry (OSV)

+3

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-28387510 days apartPotential Use-after-free in DANE Client Code
    32Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

After a memory region is freed, another reference pointing to it is still used. By then, the same region may have been allocated for different data.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
free(dev->buf);/* ... another thread is still running ... */process(dev->buf);

Fixed

c
lock(&dev->lock);free(dev->buf);dev->buf = NULL;unlock(&dev->lock);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records