Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA Linux

CVE-2024-46859: platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: Linux Linux 6821a82616f60aa72c5909b3e252ad97fb9f7e2a, 9291fadbd2720a869b1d2fcf82305648e2e62a16, b38c19783286a71693c2194ed1b36665168c09c4; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 6.6.56.1-5; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 6.6.56.1-5.
  • Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 6821a82616f60aa72c5909b3e252ad97fb9f7e2a, 9291fadbd2720a869b1d2fcf82305648e2e62a16, b38c19783286a71693c2194ed1b36665168c09c4; Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 6.6.56.1-5; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 6.6.56.1-5 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough. Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute. Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller. For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.

HighCVSS 7.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 27, 2024
Updated
Aug 5, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 12th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
7.8
CNA · Linux
7.8
agree

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2024-46859

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
linuxlinux kernel
debiandebian linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux11.0
  • linux linux kernel3.3 and later · before 5.15.168
  • linux linux kernel5.16 and later · before 6.1.111
  • linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.52
  • linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.10.11
  • linux linux kernel6.11

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Linux Linux

    • 3.3affected
    • e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 and later · before b7c2f692307fe704be87ea80d7328782b33c3cefaffected · git
    • e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 and later · before 9291fadbd2720a869b1d2fcf82305648e2e62a16affected · git
    • e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 and later · before 6821a82616f60aa72c5909b3e252ad97fb9f7e2aaffected · git
    • e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 and later · before b38c19783286a71693c2194ed1b36665168c09c4affected · git
    • e424fb8cc4e6634c10f8159b1ff5618cf7bab9c6 and later · before f52e98d16e9bd7dd2b3aef8e38db5cbc9899d6a4affected · git
    • before 3.3not affected · semver
    • 5.15.168 and later · up to and including 5.15.*not affected · semver
    • 6.1.111 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
    • 6.6.52 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12linuxbefore 6.1.112-16.1.112-1
Debian:13linuxbefore 6.10.11-16.10.11-1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV
    89Now
  • CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV
    85Now

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-46857Sep 27, 2024 · net/mlx5: Fix bridge mode operations when there are no VFs
    22Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-46858Sep 27, 2024 · mptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync
    28Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2024-46861Sep 27, 2024 · usbnet: ipheth: do not stop RX on failing RX callback
    22Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Linux Linux6821a82616f60aa72c5909b3e252ad97fb9f7e2aVendor (CNA)
Linux Linux9291fadbd2720a869b1d2fcf82305648e2e62a16Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxb38c19783286a71693c2194ed1b36665168c09c4Vendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxb7c2f692307fe704be87ea80d7328782b33c3cefVendor (CNA)
Linux Linuxf52e98d16e9bd7dd2b3aef8e38db5cbc9899d6a4Vendor (CNA)
Azure Linux 3.0 ARM6.6.56.1-5 · kernelMicrosoft (MSRC)
Azure Linux 3.0 x646.6.56.1-5 · kernelMicrosoft (MSRC)
debian:linux6.1.112-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2021-47548126 days apartethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port()
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-23246537 days apartwifi: mac80211: bounds-check link_id in ieee80211_ml_reconfiguration
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2023-2008532 days apartKernel: udmabuf: improper validation of array index leading to local privilege escalation
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2024-468210 days apartdrm/amd/pm: Fix negative array index read
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2024-468330 days apartnet: hns3: void array out of bound when loop tnl_num
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2024-468360 days apartusb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc
    31Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records