axios 1.7.2 allows SSRF via unexpected behavior where requests for path relative URLs get processed as protocol relative URLs.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 68.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: node-axios (Debian:13) 1.7.4+dfsg-1; axios (npm) 1.7.4; pgadmin4 (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 8.5-150600.3.6.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to node-axios (Debian:13) 1.7.4+dfsg-1; axios (npm) 1.7.4; pgadmin4 (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 8.5-150600.3.6.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Aug 12, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 68th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| axios | axios | cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios |
Is the Axios on your site affected?
The free JavaScript library scanner reads the Axios version from the files your site loads, matches this record and other known vulnerabilities, and gives the safe version on the same branch. If the version can't be read, it says so. No account needed.
Scan JavaScript librariesAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- axios axios1.3.2 and later · before 1.7.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | node-axios | before 1.7.4+dfsg-1 | 1.7.4+dfsg-1 |
| npm | axios | from 1.3.2 · before 1.7.4 | 1.7.4 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | pgadmin4 | before 8.5-150600.3.6.1 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | velociraptor | before 0.7.0.4.git97.675e45f9-12.1 | 0.7.0.4.git97.675e45f9-12.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP6 | pgadmin4 | before 8.5-150600.3.6.1 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 |
Same product
axios: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-42043Axios: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-62718 — NO_PROXY Protection Bypassed via RFC 1122 Loopback Subnet (127.0.0.0/8) in Axios 1.15.040Plan
- CVE-2024-57965In axios before 1.7.8, lib/helpers/isURLSameOrigin.js does not use a URL object when determining an origin, and has a potentially unwanted s39Monitor
- CVE-2026-42264Axios: Prototype pollution read-side gadgets in HTTP adapter allow credential injection and request hijacking36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2021-3749Aug 31, 2021 · Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in axios/axios33Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-45857Nov 8, 2023 · An issue discovered in Axios 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-27152Mar 7, 2025 · Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL in axios Requests30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:node-axios | 1.7.4+dfsg-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| npm:axios | 1.7.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:pgadmin4 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:velociraptor | 0.7.0.4.git97.675e45f9-12.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:pgadmin4 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-27152207 days apartPossible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL in axios Requests30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.