CVE-2024-35875: x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716e, 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374, 453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 8.4, NVD 5.5.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716e, 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374, 453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND. If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources, but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic. This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more theoretical. So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot. Add this deliberately to be "just a CoCo x86 driver feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any driver can call it with seed data of any quality, or even garbage quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to build something into the core of the RNG, consider the particular CoCo issue just a CoCo issue, and therefore separate it all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code. [ bp: Massage commit message. ]
- Published
- May 19, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.5
- CNA · Linux
- 8.4
- 2.9 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernelbefore 6.1.85
- linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.26
- linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.8.5
- linux linux kernel6.9
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 4.15affected
- d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df and later · before 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374affected · git
- d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df and later · before 453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5affected · git
- d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df and later · before 08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716eaffected · git
- d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df and later · before 99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584affected · git
- before 4.15not affected · semver
- 6.1.85 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.26 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
- 6.8.5 and later · up to and including 6.8.*not affected · semver
- 6.9 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | bpftool | before 7.3.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 7.3.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-devel | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-modules | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-modules-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-devel | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-devel-matched | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-modules | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-modules-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-64k-modules-extra | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-abi-stablelists | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-cross-headers | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-debug | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-debug-core | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-debug-devel | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-debug-devel-matched | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | kernel-debug-modules | before 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 |
+96
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-35873May 19, 2024 · riscv: Fix vector state restore in rt_sigreturn()22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-35874May 19, 2024 · aio: Fix null ptr deref in aio_complete() wakeup22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-35878May 19, 2024 · of: module: prevent NULL pointer dereference in vsnprintf()21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716e | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584 | Vendor (CNA) |
| almalinux:bpftool | 7.3.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-core | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-core | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-devel | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-modules | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-modules-core | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:kernel-64k-devel | 5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.85-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:bpftool-debuginfo | 0:7.0.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-debug-debuginfo | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-debug-devel | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-debuginfo | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-devel | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-64k-devel-matched | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debug-debuginfo | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debug-devel | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debug-devel-matched | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debuginfo | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debuginfo-common-aarch64 | 0:5.14.0-284.82.1.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:kernel | 0:5.14.0-427.35.1.el9_4 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-0506 · May 20, 2024(Linux Kernel Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.