CVE-2024-26915: drm/amdgpu: Reset IH OVERFLOW_CLEAR bit
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 2827633c9dab6304ec4cdbf369363219832e605d, 7330256268664ea0a7dd5b07a3fed363093477dd, 8983397951b4b0bd51bb4b4ba9749424e1ccbb70.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 2827633c9dab6304ec4cdbf369363219832e605d, 7330256268664ea0a7dd5b07a3fed363093477dd, 8983397951b4b0bd51bb4b4ba9749424e1ccbb70 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Reset IH OVERFLOW_CLEAR bit Allows us to detect subsequent IH ring buffer overflows as well.
- Published
- Apr 17, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
22
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 4.2affected
- d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 and later · before 9a9d00c23d170d4ef5a1b28e6b69f5c85dd12bc1affected · git
- d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 and later · before a28f4d1e0bed85943d309ac243fd1c200f8af9a2affected · git
- d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 and later · before 8983397951b4b0bd51bb4b4ba9749424e1ccbb70affected · git
- d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 and later · before 2827633c9dab6304ec4cdbf369363219832e605daffected · git
- d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 and later · before 7330256268664ea0a7dd5b07a3fed363093477ddaffected · git
- before 4.2not affected · semver
- 5.15.152 and later · up to and including 5.15.*not affected · semver
- 6.1.82 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.18 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
Affected versions · NVD (5)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernelbefore 5.15.152
- linux linux kernel5.16 and later · before 6.1.82
- linux linux kernel6.2 and later · before 6.6.18
- linux linux kernel6.7 and later · before 6.7.6
- linux linux kernel6.8
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.82-1 | 6.1.82-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.7.7-1 | 6.7.7-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe…KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-26913Apr 17, 2024 · drm/amd/display: Fix dcn35 8k30 Underflow/Corruption Issue31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-26914Apr 17, 2024 · drm/amd/display: fix incorrect mpc_combine array size31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-26916Apr 17, 2024 · Revert "drm/amd: flush any delayed gfxoff on suspend entry"22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 2827633c9dab6304ec4cdbf369363219832e605d | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 7330256268664ea0a7dd5b07a3fed363093477dd | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 8983397951b4b0bd51bb4b4ba9749424e1ccbb70 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | 9a9d00c23d170d4ef5a1b28e6b69f5c85dd12bc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | a28f4d1e0bed85943d309ac243fd1c200f8af9a2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.82-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-44466201 days apartAn issue was discovered in net/ceph/messenger_v2.c in the Linux kernel before 6.4.5.48Plan
- CVE-2023-5273534 days apartbpf, sockmap: Don't let sock_map_{close,destroy,unhash} call itself36Monitor
- CVE-2024-2692711 days apartASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data33Monitor
- CVE-2022-4865711 days apartarm64: topology: fix possible overflow in amu_fie_setup()31Monitor
- CVE-2024-2679713 days apartdrm/amd/display: Prevent potential buffer overflow in map_hw_resources31Monitor
- CVE-2024-2704514 days apartdrm/amd/display: Fix a potential buffer overflow in 'dp_dsc_clock_en_read()'31Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.