CVE-2024-26599: pwm: Fix out-of-bounds access in of_pwm_single_xlate()
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.25% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Linux Linux 7b85554c7c2aee91171e038e4d5442ffa130b282, a297d07b9a1e4fb8cda25a4a2363a507d294b7c9, bae45b7ebb31984b63b13c3519fd724b3ce92123.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Linux Linux 7b85554c7c2aee91171e038e4d5442ffa130b282, a297d07b9a1e4fb8cda25a4a2363a507d294b7c9, bae45b7ebb31984b63b13c3519fd724b3ce92123 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pwm: Fix out-of-bounds access in of_pwm_single_xlate() With args->args_count == 2 args->args[2] is not defined. Actually the flags are contained in args->args[1].
- Published
- Feb 23, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 16th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linux linux kernel5.17 and later · before 6.1.75
- linux linux kernel6.2.0 and later · before 6.6.14
- linux linux kernel6.7.0 and later · before 6.7.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Linux). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Linux Linux
- 5.17affected
- 3ab7b6ac5d829e60c3b89d415811ff1c9f358c8e and later · before 7b85554c7c2aee91171e038e4d5442ffa130b282affected · git
- 3ab7b6ac5d829e60c3b89d415811ff1c9f358c8e and later · before e5f2b4b62977fb6c2efcbc5779e0c9dce18215f7affected · git
- 3ab7b6ac5d829e60c3b89d415811ff1c9f358c8e and later · before bae45b7ebb31984b63b13c3519fd724b3ce92123affected · git
- 3ab7b6ac5d829e60c3b89d415811ff1c9f358c8e and later · before a297d07b9a1e4fb8cda25a4a2363a507d294b7c9affected · git
- before 5.17not affected · semver
- 6.1.75 and later · up to and including 6.1.*not affected · semver
- 6.6.14 and later · up to and including 6.6.*not affected · semver
- 6.7.2 and later · up to and including 6.7.*not affected · semver
- 6.8 and laternot affected · original_commit_for_fix
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | before 6.1.76-1 | 6.1.76-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | before 6.6.15-1 | 6.6.15-1 |
Same product
linux: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-31431crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-placeKEV90Now
- CVE-2022-0847A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe KEV89Now
- CVE-2021-22555Heap Out-Of-Bounds Write in Netfilter IP6T_SO_SET_REPLACEKEV85Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-26597Feb 23, 2024 · net: qualcomm: rmnet: fix global oob in rmnet_policy28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-26598Feb 23, 2024 · KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Avoid potential UAF in LPI translation cache31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-52458Feb 23, 2024 · block: add check that partition length needs to be aligned with block size22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 7b85554c7c2aee91171e038e4d5442ffa130b282 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | a297d07b9a1e4fb8cda25a4a2363a507d294b7c9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | bae45b7ebb31984b63b13c3519fd724b3ce92123 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Linux Linux | e5f2b4b62977fb6c2efcbc5779e0c9dce18215f7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:linux | 6.1.76-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-524402 days apartksmbd: fix slub overflow in ksmbd_decode_ntlmssp_auth_blob()38Monitor
- CVE-2021-4734888 days apartdrm/amd/display: Avoid HDCP over-read and corruption36Monitor
- CVE-2022-3640490 days apartLinux Kernel Bluetooth l2cap_core.c l2cap_conn_del use after free35Monitor
- CVE-2023-524343 days apartsmb: client: fix potential OOBs in smb2_parse_contexts()32Monitor
- CVE-2023-524640 days apartEDAC/thunderx: Fix possible out-of-bounds string access31Monitor
- CVE-2024-265891 days apartbpf: Reject variable offset alu on PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS31Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.