CVE-2024-23827: Nginx-UI arbitrary file write through the Import Certificate feature
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 39/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.70% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 53.7% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI (Go) 1.9.10-0.20240128060047-8581bdd3c6f4.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI (Go) 1.9.10-0.20240128060047-8581bdd3c6f4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Nginx-UI is a web interface to manage Nginx configurations. The Import Certificate feature allows arbitrary write into the system. The feature does not check if the provided user input is a certification/key and allows to write into arbitrary paths in the system. It's possible to leverage the vulnerability into a remote code execution overwriting the config file app.ini. Version 2.0.0.beta.12 fixed the issue.
- Published
- Jan 29, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 53th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
39
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 9.8
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| nginxui | nginx ui | cpe:2.3:a:nginxui:nginx_ui |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
0xJacky nginx-ui
- < 2.0.0.beta.12affected
Affected versions · NVD (20)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nginxui nginx ui1.2.0
- nginxui nginx ui1.2.1
- nginxui nginx ui1.2.2
- nginxui nginx ui1.3.0
- nginxui nginx ui1.3.1
- nginxui nginx ui1.3.2
- nginxui nginx ui1.3.3
- nginxui nginx ui1.4.0
- nginxui nginx ui1.4.1
- nginxui nginx ui1.4.2
- nginxui nginx ui1.5.0
- nginxui nginx ui1.5.1
- nginxui nginx ui1.5.2
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.0
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.1
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.2
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.3
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.5
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.6
- nginxui nginx ui1.6.7
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | before 1.9.10-0.20240128060047-8581bdd3c6f4 | 1.9.10-0.20240128060047-8581bdd3c6f4 |
Same product
nginxui: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-33032Nginx UI: Unauthenticated MCP Endpoint Allows Remote Nginx Takeover50Plan
- CVE-2026-27944Nginx UI: Unauthenticated Backup Download with Encryption Key Disclosure46Plan
- CVE-2024-49368Unchecked logrotate settings lead to arbitrary command execution43Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-22196Jan 11, 2024 · Authenticated (user role) SQL injection in `OrderAndPaginate` (GHSL-2023-270)26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-22198Jan 11, 2024 · Authenticated (user role) arbitrary command execution by modifying `start_cmd` setting (GHSL-2023-268)36Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-23828Jan 29, 2024 · Nginx-UI authenticated RCE through injecting into the application config via CRLF35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | 1.9.10-0.20240128060047-8581bdd3c6f4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-49366266 days apartNginx UI's json field can construct a directory traversal payload, causing arbitrary files to be written30Monitor
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-0074 · Jan 30, 2024(NGINX Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.