CVE-2026-33032: Nginx UI: Unauthenticated MCP Endpoint Allows Remote Nginx Takeover
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 50/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 35.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. In versions 2.3.5 and prior, the nginx-ui MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration exposes two HTTP endpoints: /mcp and /mcp_message. While /mcp requires both IP whitelisting and authentication (AuthRequired() middleware), the /mcp_message endpoint only applies IP whitelisting - and the default IP whitelist is empty, which the middleware treats as "allow all". This means any network attacker can invoke all MCP tools without authentication, including restarting nginx, creating/modifying/deleting nginx configuration files, and triggering automatic config reloads - achieving complete nginx service takeover. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
- Published
- Mar 30, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 35.2% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-306
Report tools
Action score
50
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 11 / 30 · 35.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 9.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| nginxui | nginx ui | cpe:2.3:a:nginxui:nginx_ui |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- nginxui nginx uiup to 2.3.5 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
0xJacky nginx-ui
- <= 2.3.5affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | up to and including 1.99 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1 | 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1 |
Same product
nginxui: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-27944Nginx UI: Unauthenticated Backup Download with Encryption Key Disclosure46Plan
- CVE-2024-49368Unchecked logrotate settings lead to arbitrary command execution43Plan
- CVE-2026-44015Nginx UI: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Cluster Proxy Middleware Allows Access to Internal Services39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-33029Mar 30, 2026 · Nginx UI: DoS via Negative Integer Input in Logrotate Interval27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-33030Mar 30, 2026 · Nginx UI: Unencrypted Storage of DNS API Tokens and ACME Private Keys39Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-33026Mar 30, 2026 · nginx-ui Backup Restore Allows Tampering with Encrypted Backups37Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20260402T184258-150000.1.158.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×4
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2026-33032 | — |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2026-04-03 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:1 | 2026-04-17 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:5 | 2026-04-18 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-08-21 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+3 d
- TodayNov 5, 2026+220 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-2794425 days apartNginx UI: Unauthenticated Backup Download with Encryption Key Disclosure46Plan
- CVE-2026-4222135 days apartnginx-ui: Unauthenticated First-Run Installer Allows Remote Initial Admin Claim39Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-330300 days apartNginx UI: Unencrypted Storage of DNS API Tokens and ACME Private Keys39Monitor
- CVE-2026-4401543 days apartNginx UI: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Cluster Proxy Middleware Allows Access to Internal Services39Monitor
- CVE-2026-330280 days apartNginx UI: Race Condition Leads to Persistent Data Corruption and Service Collapse28Monitor
- CVE-2026-330270 days apartNginx UI: Improper Path Validation Allows Recursive Deletion of the Nginx Configuration Directory27Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-306 · Missing Authentication for Critical FunctionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A function added for development or support ships to production without authentication. It often relies on the assumption that it is “only reachable from the internal network.”
The bug in code
The whole CWE-306 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
// Added for the support team
app.post("/maintenance/reset", resetDevice);Fixed
if (config.maintenanceEnabled) {
app.post(
"/maintenance/reset",
requireSession, requireRole("admin"), resetDevice
);
}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.