CVE-2024-22120: Time Based SQL Injection in Zabbix Server Audit Log
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 58/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Nuclei); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 76.6% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Zabbix Zabbix 6.0.28rc1, 6.4.13rc1, 7.0.0beta1.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to Zabbix Zabbix 6.0.28rc1, 6.4.13rc1, 7.0.0beta1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Zabbix server can perform command execution for configured scripts. After command is executed, audit entry is added to "Audit Log". Due to "clientip" field is not sanitized, it is possible to injection SQL into "clientip" and exploit time based blind SQL injection.
- Published
- May 17, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 76.6% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
58
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 23 / 30 · 76.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · Zabbix
- 9.1
- 0.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| zabbix | zabbix | cpe:2.3:a:zabbix:zabbix |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Zabbix). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Zabbix Zabbix
- 6.0.0 and later · up to and including 6.0.27affected · gitfixed in 6.0.28rc1
- 6.4.0 and later · up to and including 6.4.12affected · gitfixed in 6.4.13rc1
- 7.0.0alpha1 and later · up to and including 7.0.0beta1affected · gitfixed in 7.0.0beta1
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- zabbix zabbix6.0.0 and later · before 6.0.28
- zabbix zabbix6.4.0 and later · before 6.4.13
- zabbix zabbix7.0.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.18 | zabbix | from 6.0.0 · before 6.4.15-r0 | 6.4.15-r0 |
| Alpine:v3.19 | zabbix | from 6.0.0 · before 6.4.14-r0 | 6.4.14-r0 |
| Debian:12 | zabbix | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | zabbix | before 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1 | 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1 |
Same product
zabbix: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-23131Unsafe client-side session storage leading to authentication bypass/instance takeover via Zabbix Frontend with configured SAMLKEV98Now
- CVE-2022-23134Possible view of the setup pages by unauthenticated users if config file already existsKEV80Now
- CVE-2016-10134SQL injection vulnerability in Zabbix before 2.2.14 and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the…64This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-32724Oct 12, 2023 · JavaScript engine memory pointers are directly available for Zabbix users for modification35Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-22119Feb 9, 2024 · Stored XSS in graph items select form21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-22114Aug 12, 2024 · System Information Widget in Global View Dashboard exposes information about Hosts to Users without Permission17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Zabbix Zabbix | 6.0.28rc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 6.4.13rc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 7.0.0beta1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| alpine:zabbix | 6.4.15-r0 · Alpine:v3.18 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:zabbix | 1:6.0.29+dfsg-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Nuclei detection template ×1
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×4
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | 4 repositories | 2024-05-20 → 2026-05-06 |
| Nuclei detection template | Nuclei template CVE-2024-22120 | — |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+3 d
- TodayNov 12, 2026+909 d
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Maxim Tyukov (mf0cuz)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-29452309 days apartRemove possibility to add html into Geomap attribution field40Plan
- CVE-2023-29451309 days apartDenial of service caused by a bug in the JSON parser30Monitor
- CVE-2024-2211998 days apartStored XSS in graph items select form21Monitor
- CVE-2023-32721218 days apartStored XSS in Maps element21Monitor
- CVE-2024-22117193 days apartValue of sysmap_element_url can be de-synchronized causing the map element to crash when new URLs is added8Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →