CVE-2024-21815: Insufficiently protected credentials (CWE-522) for third party DVR integrations to the Command Centre Server are accessible to…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.33% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 9.1, NVD 6.5.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Insufficiently protected credentials (CWE-522) for third party DVR integrations to the Command Centre Server are accessible to authenticated but unprivileged users. This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre 9.00 prior to vEL9.00.1774 (MR2), 8.90 prior to vEL8.90.1751 (MR3), 8.80 prior to vEL8.80.1526 (MR4), 8.70 prior to vEL8.70.2526 (MR6), all version of 8.60 and prior.
- Published
- Mar 4, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 27th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-522
Report tools
Action score
26
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · Gallagher
- 9.1
- 2.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gallagher | command centre | cpe:2.3:a:gallagher:command_centre |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Gallagher). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Gallagher Command Centre Server
- up to and including 8.60affected
- 9.00 and later · before vEL9.00.1774 (MR2)affected
- 8.90 and later · before vEL8.90.1751 (MR3)affected
- 8.80 and later · before vEL8.80.1526 (MR4)affected
- 8.70 and later · before vEL8.70.2526 (MR6)affected
Affected versions · NVD (5)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gallagher command centreup to 8.60 inclusive
- gallagher command centre8.70 and later · before 8.70.2526
- gallagher command centre8.80 and later · before 8.80.1526
- gallagher command centre8.90 and later · before 8.90.1751
- gallagher command centre9.00 and later · before 9.00.1774
Same product
gallagher: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-16098It is possible to enumerate access card credentials via an unauthenticated network connection to the server in versions of Command Centre…39Monitor
- CVE-2019-15294An issue was discovered in Gallagher Command Centre 8.10 before 8.10.1092(MR2).39Monitor
- CVE-2020-16103Type confusion in Gallagher Command Centre Server allows a remote attacker to crash the server or possibly cause remote code execution.36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-23584Dec 18, 2023 ·
An observable response discrepancy in the Gallagher Command Centre RESTAPI allows an insufficiently-privileged user to infer the presence…17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-46686Dec 18, 2023 ·
A reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision could be exploited by a privileged user to configure the Gallagher Command Centre…28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-21838Mar 4, 2024 ·
Improper neutralization of special elements in output (CWE-74) used by the email generation feature of the Command Centre Server could…21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-522 · Insufficiently Protected CredentialsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Session SidejackingCAPEC-102likelihood: High · High
- Signature Spoofing by Key TheftCAPEC-474likelihood: Medium · High
- Password Recovery ExploitationCAPEC-50likelihood: Medium · High
- KerberoastingCAPEC-509High
- Modify Existing ServiceCAPEC-551
- Remote Services with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-555Very High
- Use of Known Domain CredentialsCAPEC-560likelihood: High · High
- Windows Admin Shares with Stolen CredentialsCAPEC-561
ATT&CK techniques
- Remote ServicesT1021
- Remote Services:SMB/Windows Admin SharesT1021.002
- Valid AccountsT1078
- Brute Force:Credential StuffingT1110.004
- Email Collection:Remote Email CollectionT1114.002
- External Remote ServicesT1133
- Create or Modify System ProcessT1543
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The HashT1550.002
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Pass The TicketT1550.003
- Unsecured Credentials: Private KeysT1552.004
- Steal or Forge Kerberos TicketsT1558
- Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets:KerberoastingT1558.003
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.