NVD / CVE Program· CNA GRAFANA

CVE-2024-1313: Users outside an organization can delete a snapshot with its key

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.64% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 51% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
Fixed version: Grafana Grafana 10.0.13, 10.1.9, 10.2.6.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to Grafana Grafana 10.0.13, 10.1.9, 10.2.6 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

It is possible for a user in a different organization from the owner of a snapshot to bypass authorization and delete a snapshot by issuing a DELETE request to /api/snapshots/<key> using its view key. This functionality is intended to only be available to individuals with the permission to write/edit to the snapshot in question, but due to a bug in the authorization logic, deletion requests issued by an unprivileged user in a different organization than the snapshot owner are treated as authorized. Grafana Labs would like to thank Ravid Mazon and Jay Chen of Palo Alto Research for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability. This issue affects Grafana: from 9.5.0 before 9.5.18, from 10.0.0 before 10.0.13, from 10.1.0 before 10.1.9, from 10.2.0 before 10.2.6, from 10.3.0 before 10.3.5.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available

Broken access control (IDOR)

Published: Mar 26, 2024
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 0.6% · 51th percentile
CWE: CWE-639

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: —
CNA · GRAFANA: 6.5; NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GRAFANA). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

Grafana Grafana
- 10.4.0not affected
- 9.5.0 and later · before 9.5.18affected · semver
- 10.0.0 and later · before 10.0.13affected · semver
- 10.1.0 and later · before 10.1.9affected · semver
- 10.2.0 and later · before 10.2.6affected · semver
- 10.3.0 and later · before 10.3.5affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

Ecosystem	Package	Affected range	Fix
AlmaLinux:8	grafana	before 9.2.10-16.el8_10	9.2.10-16.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8	grafana-selinux	before 9.2.10-16.el8_10	9.2.10-16.el8_10
AlmaLinux:9	grafana	before 9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1	9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1
AlmaLinux:9	grafana-selinux	before 9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1	9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 0	—
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 10.0.0 · before 10.0.13	10.0.13
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 10.1.0 · before 10.1.9	10.1.9
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 10.2.0 · before 10.2.6	10.2.6
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 10.3.0 · before 10.3.5	10.3.5
Go	github.com/grafana/grafana	from 9.5.0 · before 9.5.18	9.5.18
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	ansible	before 2.9.27-150000.1.17.2	2.9.27-150000.1.17.2
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	dracut-saltboot	before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	golang-github-prometheus-promu	before 0.14.0-150000.3.18.2	0.14.0-150000.3.18.2
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	grafana	before 9.5.18-150200.3.56.1	9.5.18-150200.3.56.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	mybatis	before 3.5.6-150200.5.6.1	3.5.6-150200.5.6.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	POS_Image-Graphical7	before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	POS_Image-JeOS7	before 0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2
openSUSE:Leap 15.5	spacecmd	before 4.3.27-150000.3.116.2	4.3.27-150000.3.116.2
openSUSE:Tumbleweed	grafana	before 10.3.5-1.1	10.3.5-1.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream	grafana	before 0:9.2.10-16.el8_10	0:9.2.10-16.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream	grafana-debuginfo	before 0:9.2.10-16.el8_10	0:9.2.10-16.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream	grafana-debugsource	before 0:9.2.10-16.el8_10	0:9.2.10-16.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream	grafana-selinux	before 0:9.2.10-16.el8_10	0:9.2.10-16.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream	grafana	before 0:9.2.10-16.el9_4	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4

+38

Same product

grafana: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2021-39226Snapshot authentication bypass in grafanaKEV
89Now
CVE-2021-43798Grafana path traversalKEV
87Now
CVE-2024-9264Grafana SQL Expressions allow for remote code execution
66This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2023-5122Feb 14, 2024 · SSRF in CSV Datasource Plugin
21Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2024-1442Mar 7, 2024 · User with permissions to create a data source can CRUD all data sources
35Monitor
Later →CVE-2024-6322Aug 20, 2024 · Access control for plugin data sources protected by the ReqActions json field of the plugin.json is bypassed if the user or service account
21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / package	Fixed version	Source
Grafana Grafana	10.0.13	Vendor (CNA)
Grafana Grafana	10.1.9	Vendor (CNA)
Grafana Grafana	10.2.6	Vendor (CNA)
Grafana Grafana	10.3.5	Vendor (CNA)
Grafana Grafana	9.5.18	Vendor (CNA)
almalinux:grafana	9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9	Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:grafana-selinux	9.2.10-16.el9_4.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:9	Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/grafana/grafana	10.0.13	Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/grafana/grafana	10.1.9	Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/grafana/grafana	10.2.6	Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/grafana/grafana	10.3.5	Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/grafana/grafana	9.5.18	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible	2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:dracut-saltboot	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:golang-github-prometheus-promu	0.14.0-150000.3.18.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:grafana	9.5.18-150200.3.56.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:mybatis	3.5.6-150200.5.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:POS_Image-Graphical7	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:POS_Image-JeOS7	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.21.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:spacecmd	4.3.27-150000.3.116.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5	Package registry (OSV)
red hat:grafana	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream	Package registry (OSV)
red hat:grafana-debuginfo	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream	Package registry (OSV)
red hat:grafana-debugsource	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream	Package registry (OSV)
red hat:grafana-selinux	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream	Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:grafana	0:9.2.10-16.el9_4 · Rocky Linux:9	Package registry (OSV)
suse:ansible	2.9.27-150000.1.17.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15	Package registry (OSV)
suse:dracut-saltboot	0.1.1710765237.46af599-150000.1.53.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 15	Package registry (OSV)
suse:golang-github-prometheus-alertmanager	0.26.0-1.27.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 12	Package registry (OSV)
suse:golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter	1.7.0-1.30.2 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 12	Package registry (OSV)
suse:golang-github-prometheus-promu	0.14.0-1.18.1 · SUSE:Manager Client Tools 12	Package registry (OSV)

+16

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Ravid Mazonfinder
Jay Chenfinder

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

CVE-2024-10452217 days apartOrganization admins can delete pending invites created in an organization they are not part of.
10Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
A low-privileged account is enough.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: none
Integrity: high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: none

Attack vector: Network
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: Low
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: None
Integrity impact: High
Availability impact: None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-639 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
2res.json(invoice);

Fixed

1const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
2  id: req.params.id,
3  ownerId: req.user.id,
4});
5if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
6res.json(invoice);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

Fix✗ → ✓Sep 28, 2026, 10:08 PM UTC

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2024-1313/

Show all references (1 more)

security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240524-0008/

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records