CVE-2024-10452: Organization admins can delete pending invites created in an organization they are not part of.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 10/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241104T154416-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241104T154416-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Oct 29, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 42th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
10
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 10 / 40 · 2.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 2.7
- CNA · GRAFANA
- 2.2
- 0.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| grafana | grafana | cpe:2.3:a:grafana:grafana |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- grafana grafana10.4.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GRAFANA). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Grafana Grafana
- 10.4.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/grafana/grafana | from 0 | — |
| Go | github.com/grafana/grafana | up to and including 10.4.0 | — |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-1.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-5.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-5.1 |
Same product
grafana: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-39226Snapshot authentication bypass in grafanaKEV89Now
- CVE-2021-43798Grafana path traversalKEV87Now
- CVE-2024-9264Grafana SQL Expressions allow for remote code execution66This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-6322Aug 20, 2024 · Access control for plugin data sources protected by the ReqActions json field of the plugin.json is bypassed if the user or service account…21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-8118Sep 26, 2024 · Grafana alerting wrong permission on datasource rule write endpoint20Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-11741Jan 31, 2025 · Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability.17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-1313217 days apartUsers outside an organization can delete a snapshot with its key26Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
- Grafana Labs - Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP)Intigriti · disclosure only (VDP) · grafana/grafana
- Grafana Labs - Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP)Intigriti · disclosure only (VDP)
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.