CVE-2024-0567: Gnutls: rejects certificate chain with distributed trust
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 72% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls gnutls 3.8.3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls gnutls 3.8.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS, where a cockpit (which uses gnuTLS) rejects a certificate chain with distributed trust. This issue occurs when validating a certificate chain with cockpit-certificate-ensure. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote client or attacker to initiate a denial of service attack.
- Published
- Jan 16, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.3% · 72th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnu | gnutls | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:gnutls |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| netapp | active iq unified manager | cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The GnuTLS version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux11.0
- fedoraproject fedora38
- fedoraproject fedora39
- gnu gnutls3.7.0 and later · before 3.8.3
- netapp active iq unified managerall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls gnutls
- 3.8.0 and later · before 3.8.3affected · semver
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 and laternot affected · rpm
- 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 and laternot affected · rpm
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support
- 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
- v4.15.0-37 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-68 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-158 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-39 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-58 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-158 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-13 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-81 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-158 and laternot affected · rpm
- v4.15.0-79 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
- v5.8.6-22 and laternot affected · rpm
- v5.8.6-11 and laternot affected · rpm
- v6.8.1-407 and laternot affected · rpm
- v5.8.6-19 and laternot affected · rpm
- v1.0.0-479 and laternot affected · rpm
- v5.8.6-7 and laternot affected · rpm
- v0.4.0-247 and laternot affected · rpm
- v5.8.6-5 and laternot affected · rpm
- v1.1.0-227 and laternot affected · rpm
- v5.8.1-470 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnutls | before 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnutls-c++ | before 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnutls-dane | before 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnutls-devel | before 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | gnutls-utils | before 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Alpine:v3.18 | gnutls | from 3.7.0 · before 3.8.3-r0 | 3.8.3-r0 |
| Debian:12 | gnutls28 | before 3.7.9-2+deb12u2 | 3.7.9-2+deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | gnutls28 | before 3.8.3-1 | 3.8.3-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.4 | gnutls | before 3.7.3-150400.4.41.3 | 3.7.3-150400.4.41.3 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | gnutls | before 3.8.3-1.1 | 3.8.3-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-c++ | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-c++-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-dane | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-dane-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-debugsource | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-devel | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-utils | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | gnutls-utils-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | gnutls | before 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | gnutls-c++ | before 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 | 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | gnutls-c++-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 | 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | gnutls-dane | before 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 | 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | gnutls-dane-debuginfo | before 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 | 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 |
+8
Same product
gnu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-5334Double free vulnerability in the gnutls_x509_ext_import_proxy function in GnuTLS before 3.3.26 and 3.5.x before 3.5.8 allows remote attacker49Plan
- CVE-2019-3829A vulnerability was found in gnutls versions from 3.5.8 before 3.6.7.48Plan
- CVE-2008-1948The _gnutls_server_name_recv_params function in lib/ext_server_name.c in libgnutls in gnutls-serv in GnuTLS before 2.2.4 does not properly c44Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-0361Feb 15, 2023 · A timing side-channel in the handling of RSA ClientKeyExchange messages was discovered in GnuTLS.29Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-0553Jan 16, 2024 · Gnutls: incomplete fix for cve-2023-598130Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-32988Jul 10, 2025 · Gnutls: vulnerability in gnutls othername san export32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls gnutls | 3.8.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| almalinux:gnutls | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnutls-c++ | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnutls-dane | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnutls-devel | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnutls-utils | 3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:gnutls | 3.8.3-r0 · Alpine:v3.18 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:gnutls28 | 3.7.9-2+deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:gnutls | 3.7.3-150400.4.41.3 · openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-c++ | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-c++-debuginfo | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-dane | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-dane-debuginfo | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-debuginfo | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-debugsource | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-devel | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-utils | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:gnutls-utils-debuginfo | 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:gnutls | 3.7.3-150400.4.41.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567
- lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/19/3
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZEIOLORQ7N6WRPFXZSYDL2MC4LP7VFV/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GNXKVR5YNUEBNHAHM5GSYKBZX4W2HMN2/
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240202-0011/
- cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.